1984 Mazda 626 Super Deluxe 2.0L Carby

Summary:

Absolute piece of crap. More than a lemon... Much more

Faults:

Needed a complete coolant flush.

Dizzy cap blew up.

Central locking sometimes dies.

Left passenger door lock doesn't go all the way down.

Clutch had to be replaced.

Needed stepped flywheel.

Needed new clutch cable.

Main Seal was leaking.

Fuel Pump leaking.

Coolant + Oil leaks.

Front & Rear Brakes needed rebuild.

Ignition barrel broke.

Wiring in dash short circuited on nearby metal.

Front right suspension rubber worn away.

Gearbox syncro's worn (gearbox is whining)

Sticky 1st + 2nd Gear

Diff is whining

Drivers power window doesn't automatically stop winding.

Have I forgotten anything???

General Comments:

Absolute piece of crap.

Do NOT buy an old Mazda, especially a fwd, manual 80's Mazda. Never purchasing a FWD again. Awful to drive (compared to RWD).

Most unreliable car I have ever owned.

Battery + Engine have never died on me, just every other component of the car has.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 21st February, 2007

22nd Feb 2007, 09:59

It's a 23 year old car! These items are expected to go and the previous owner probably unloaded it on you to avoid spending the money. When buying a used car, you should always have it inspected by a professional. If you had done this, you would not have bought this car.

1984 Mazda 626 2.0L

Summary:

A reliable and quick sedan

Faults:

Side-skirts are badly disintegrated and have started to fall off.

Strange noises from the air conditioning compressor appeared at approximately 1,950,000 kilometers. This eventually led to the failure of the compressor.

Rear seat headrests have faded and worn badly due to heat and other sun damage. Interior upholstery throughout the car is also sun damaged.

Central locking is now starting to fail, with the front passenger unable to lock or unlock, the rear passenger unable to unlock and the rear driver seat unable to lock.

Electrical units, such as the cruise control system, failed soon after the compressor died.

The steering is slightly off-center.

General Comments:

This is a great first car for anybody that has just earned their license, the manual is nippy and reliable with very low fuel consumption.

The steering, due to not being power assisted, is a little too heavy for some. However, it holds the 'line' quite well and cornering is just plain fun.

Massive under-steer is evident when pushed a little too hard through corners.

Wheel-spin is common.

Seats are relatively comfortable for an older model car, although the upholstery needs to be covered up.

First through to third gear have acceleration 'flat spots'. This causes the car to keep revving without an increase in acceleration. It can be irritating, but the driver can overcome this with quick changing of gears. When this is overcome, the acceleration is linear and it feels as if the car always has something more to give. My top speed is 195 Kilometers per hour and times of 7 to 8 seconds for the 100km/h mark have been achieved.

The car does not like to start/'kick-over' when the engine is above, approximately, 70 degrees Celsius.

All in all, an excellent first car and a pleasure to drive.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 17th March, 2003

14th Feb 2004, 10:02

Mate 7-8 0_100...c'mon, I had an 83 that probably did it in around 15...and it was a fast one... they had 68kw and weighed well over a tonne...7-8...hahaha.

8th Apr 2004, 23:49

Yeah, 7-8 seconds to 100km/h, I don't think so. Maybe 17-18 seconds. I have an '84 Coupe, and there's no way you ever got to 195 km/h without a new engine.

17th Jun 2004, 22:40

The turbo version would juust about do those numbers if you were a real good driver, standard 626 is much slower.

2nd May 2005, 06:17

I have a 94 626 coupe and after reading that colcked mine at 12.349, to 100Kph and that's not a turbo..

23rd Jul 2005, 02:05

I have a 83 model with a reconditioned engine. it makes 0-100km in 8-9 seconds. perhaps the reason for your slow performance is bad driving? I have also reached speeds of 160km per hour with plenty more to give. these results are not as unlikely as you think.

3rd Nov 2005, 22:43

I have the same model and it is unbelievably fast for a 1.3 tonne clunker. I have ripped off newer V6 "common-doors" quite easily at the lights with power to spare (though it does get screaming). My 0-100 estimate is around 8 seconds.

Mine is an automatic. Only problem with leadfooting is that it chews up a lot of fuel. And I do not think it's good for the torque converter.

The old suzuki sierra I had before this car went to 0-100 in about 13 seconds (tested at a club day) and that was slow. To me anyway.

8th Aug 2007, 03:39

If well looked after and regularly serviced the 2.0l versions perform very well considering their age and output.

26th Jan 2008, 20:45

The best you'll get out of an Australian spec 2 litre manual 626 sedan from 0-100km/h is 11.8 seconds. The automatic is about 1.2 seconds slower, on average. Top speed is not quite 180km/h.

A New Zealand spec 2 litre manual sedan will do 0-100km/h in 10.8 seconds, due to not having the same emissions control gear as the Aussie spec version. The top speed is 185km/h.

1984 Mazda 626 - 2.0L (FE)

Summary:

Cheap car, cheap to run, pretty cheap to fix

Faults:

Replaced a lot of the exhaust.

Replaced the radiator.

Can't afford to get the air conditioning fixed for the 3rd time!

Starter motor solenoid replaced.

It currently has a very small oil leak.

General Comments:

This is my first car, but I swear I am not biased about it. It's a great first car, but if I had more money, I would have bought a newer car. It's never left me stranded anywhere, the things that go wrong just slowly die.

I'd definitely recommend this model (perhaps the 87 though) to a first car buyer. It's cheap to buy, cheap to run, and I've found it cheap to fix. The parts are everywhere, because they are such a popular car.

If I'd had a manual licence, I would also have purchased a manual. The old automatics are really terrible, they stall when cold, and really don't know what they are doing. I think that's really the only problem I've had with the car.

Definitely worth a look.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th September, 2002

26th Sep 2006, 05:35

Hey.

What sort of fuel economy did you get out of your 626?

I have a '84 626 and its currently at about 20L/100Km which is not very good at all.