2007 Toyota Hiace 2.7L
Summary:
Durable, dependable cheap to run, but basic and no luxury frills
Faults:
I regularly drive a Toyota Hiace Commuter at work, and I’m the one who organises maintenance for it. All in all, a good dependable vehicle, although maintenance is starting to get expensive now there is 400000+ on her. Interior is very basic, but really the van handles reasonably well considering that this is a van, not a car. Some minor negatives are cornering isn’t the best, as the van has a high centre of gravity as well as a live rear axle. Life can get bumpy as the driver's seat is directly above the front wheels. We find tyre wear to be an issue, but that could be partly to do with how we drive our vans.
Positives are the Toyota quality and reliability that’s baked right in. Although the vans suspension and steering now feels a little worn, it is pretty good considering she is fast approaching half a million kilometres. A few little things have been replaced, such as wheel bearings, but most suspension components are original, as well as the original ball joints. Engine still feels strong, and is not consuming too much oil.
General Comments:
Not fancy, but great mechanical quality and durability. Basic, no frills, low cost to run, won’t let you down.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 14th April, 2018
21st Apr 2015, 21:41
Have you thought of installing an Eaton Truetrac Ltd? I've been thinking about solutions for our RWD Holden Commodore, and look back on our old Hiace with great fondness. It was very easy to lose traction going up gravel hills etc. Have read good stuff on them and they are quite affordable (based on eBay prices); the helical design is apparently super low maintenance and noise.
It sounds silly now saying it, what tyres are you running? Our Commodore is running a brand that gets terrible reviews called an Austyre. I know that often the tyres fitted to vans are not the best and would consider changing the tyres first now. The VW Caddy Maxi I have came with cheap Bridgestone (rate terribly in the wet and dry traction), Hankooks are better, but not by much, and Continentals were amazing by comparison. Do some research for yourself, but I replaced the fronts first because on the Caddy they are the driving wheels, then the rears. I wonder if Continental or other quality brands make a tyre fit for purpose. Cheap van tyres are scary, but I reckon they got these because they know buyers are thinking of other things when they buy a van. In my limited experience, it is worth paying a little more for more traction. The Continental tyres have made the ride a lot smoother and the traction heaps better.