2007 Toyota Prado GXL 4.0 litre V6 petrol

Summary:

Excellent off road, tough and comfortable, but a high fuel consumption

Faults:

Rear drive shaft universal joint yoke flogged out.

Rack end ball joint worn.

Serpentine belt idler failed (after hosing the engine).

General Comments:

By far the best vehicle I've ever driven on rough roads and steep tracks.

Plenty of power for overtaking on the open road.

Tough. Comfortable. Well designed and built.

High fuel consumption (typically 14 l/100km), but I suppose that's what you get from a large, heavy petrol 4WD.

Steering at highway speeds is less precise than I'd like. It has a slight tendency to wander, so more frequent minor corrections are necessary than is the case for many other vehicles.

It has two completely unnecessary ancillary equipment faults/stupidities which Toyota should never have let past.

- The satnav destination (and some other things) can not be changed while the vehicle is moving. The satnav is frequently slow to respond to user input, and intermittently freezes up for minutes at a time. To set the destination as a city centre (rather than a street address) is ridiculously complicated. These faults (features?) mean the satnav is pretty much useless, so we carry and use a cheapo Chinese unit instead.

- The cruise control is the worst we've had in any car (including a 1988 Jaguar!), in that at highway speeds it causes the auto to change frequently up and down on even slight changes in incline. This is so pronounced that on some roads we just don't use it as we don't want to wear out the auto unnecessarily.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th September, 2015

20th Feb 2016, 10:21

I agree with the comments re cruise control. I don't bother using it.

We have the 2005 4L petrol.

Otherwise a solid reliable wagon. Ours now has 140000 km on it; have had it since 40000 and nothing major has gone wrong.

Don't think the interior plastics are quite up to usual Toyota standards, but our kids give it a hard life, hence some breakages. Also it's very expensive to replace some interior parts, so just have to live with breakages.

18th Nov 2017, 08:17

I agree about the interior plastics.

The car interior is durable - but the exterior and chassis are so strong and open to abuse... that we chuck ladders and wood panels and scooters and washing machines - into the back... and forget that the plastics are still made of plastic and cannot be repainted.

Great truck! We love it to bits.

2004 Toyota Prado VX 4.0 V6 petrol

Summary:

Well built, reliable, tough as nails

Faults:

Nothing thus far.

General Comments:

Magnificently built 4WD.

Super reliable.

Looks good.

Comfortable and a very long touring range with the 180 litre fuel capacity.

A heavy car, so it isn't very fuel efficient, particularly in the petrol version.

Drives like a 4WD. Not a car for the driving enthusiasts.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 23rd January, 2010

2005 Toyota Prado VX 4.0 petrol

Summary:

Great family wagon with genuine offroad and towing ability

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

Purchased this vehicle as a safe family car, and as a tow vehicle for a medium sized boat.

The third row of seats gives the ability to carry up to 8 occupants.

Would have opted for the D4D diesel engine, but these versions commanded a large price premium that I didn't feel was justified for my needs. The 4 litre petrol (1GR-FE) is however an impressively strong powerplant, and I get around 13 litres per 100 km in mixed driving.

Feels solid on the road, and is a good touring vehicle. It does need to be driven cautiously on winding roads, bearing in mind it doesn't have car-type suspension and is high off the ground.

Tows brilliantly - in fact a bit too well, I got a speeding ticket the first time I towed the boat with it.

Disappointing stereo for a vehicle that costs this much new.

Should also come with parking sensors as standard, because rear visibility is poor.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th August, 2009

23rd Feb 2011, 17:31

We have a 05 VX V6 too. We are very impressed with the vehicle, and I know what you mean about speeding in it, it's very easy. Our Prado was optioned with parking sensors when new (only 2), but still found it hard to park, so we had a rear camera fitted, which is great, and so handy when reversing with trailers etc.

29th Feb 2012, 04:53

Hi there.

I am struggling to make a decision between a Prado and a Fortuner:

2005 Prado 4.0 V6, Auto, 150 000km for R249 000.

or

2007 Fortuner 4.0 V6, manual, 85000km for R217 000.

They are both 4x4.

Which one will be the best buy???

Please reply urgently to martin@flagprop.co.za

23rd Dec 2013, 03:37

I will say buy the Prado.

10th Dec 2016, 13:19

I bought both.

A Toyota Fortuner in 2011 and a Toyota Prado in 2016.

Same 2.7 VVTI engine.

The Fortuner has more basic truck suspension. The Prado feels more "posh" and "big limousine" like on the road.

Both are fun. One costs more than the other. Fuel consumption is about the same.

21st Oct 2017, 23:55

Hi,

I am also faced with a similar situation, albeit between Prado (120) and the Hilux, both v6.

For comfort I will go with the Prado; it just handles much better and the looks appeal to me as well.

In S.A. there are TOO many Fortuners on the road and I don't like the way they drive.

Rand for rand (dollar for dollar) one is cheaper, lower miles on it etc etc.

At the end it comes down as to preference and which vehicle will meet your needs.