2005 Cadillac CTS 3.6
Summary:
This car was a horrible experience, and I can't wait to be rid of it
Faults:
Engine blew up at 51000 miles right after the manufacturer's warranty. Cadillac would not return my calls or help me in anyway. After paying for the repairs out of pocket, a crossover pipe inside the engine has a leak. This is estimated at 1150 for repairs. The value of the car is so low, it is not worth the investment.
The car is a nightmare to drive in the snow; you cannot get traction and get stuck in the driveway with a dusting of snow. I have kept up the maintenance and repairs on this car, and nothing seems to go right. I would never buy another GM car!
General Comments:
The car is unreliable, expensive to maintain, and generally not safe.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 10th December, 2010
23rd Feb 2013, 08:44
GM and Cadillac have got clever with giving potential buyers of this type of car exactly what they want in a car. Most buyers of this model Caddy have never owned a Caddy before, so they seem to think this is what a Caddy should be. Those of us who have had Fleetwoods and Broughams wouldn't look twice at a CTS because we know it's a complete farce of a Cadillac. Fleetwoods and Broughams are heavy enough in the rear, so they don't get stuck easily. A dusting of snow is nothing for them to handle. An Eldo from the 70's and early 80's is so good in snow, it may as well be a 4 wheel drive. Yet every winter I see STS and CTS stuck on 1 inch of snow.