1989 Chevrolet Celebrity Base 2.5L
Summary:
A trusty old girl
Faults:
Engine harness (previous owners).
DIS module.
ECM.
Alternator.
Fuel pump.
Battery.
Belts.
Replaced engine (previous owner's fault).
Motor mounts.
Brake pads.
Wheel cylinders.
Tires.
Rack and pinion leak.
Window regulators.
General Comments:
If this car was maintained better then I would not have had to replace these parts. But the car is a keeper and I love it.
The car has some rust, but being a Florida car, not much. But being a soon to be 27 year old car, what can I say? If the car had the F41 suspension, then that would spice it up a bit.
The gas gauge is old and inaccurate, so I often put gas in it every Friday.
The 2.5L is a noisy little reliable workhorse.
The 3 speed auto is a very reliable transmission.
The seats do not recline, and the head liner is long gone, but what do I care?
The newer ones are much better, such as the Oldsmobile Ciera, and Buick Century from 1987-1996. The V6s are faster, while the 4s are slower but reliable, and have good economy.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Review Date: 16th July, 2015
1st Jul 2016, 21:26
I am the original writer of this review and would like to say the Celebrity is still running strong. Worked on some of the rust, like doing bodywork and regular maintenance. I had to replace my alternator and distributor, and tuned her up this year. The old girl just passed a blow by test and emissions test at the school. Great car!
19th Jul 2015, 03:16
Good review.
The problems you mentioned were endemic to the vehicle. Abused or not (I worked for a Buick dealer in the early 90s).
The virtues you mentioned were also endemic to the vehicle. The 2.5 had relatively minor flaws (which were not a problem by 1989), and the THM 125 transmission was supremely, surprisingly reliable (compared to "wonders" like the THM 440).