1998 Chrysler Concorde LXi 3.2L
Faults:
Dual Cat. Converters went at 25,000 miles, but were covered under warranty. Besides that I did 155,000 miles with only basic maintenance (oil changes/brakes/tune up at 100,000 miles). No major or minor repairs, and was confident I was going to get another 100,000 trouble-free miles out of it.
General Comments:
I rear-ended a car and totaled my Concorde (front-end collisions result in extreme repair costs). When looking for a new car, I only looked for another Concorde. I have heard terrible stories about the 2.7L, but never a bad one about the 3.2L. I bought another 1998 with 55,000 miles and am positive I'll get 150,000+ out of it easy. My new one doesn't have ABS brakes or traction control (a big mistake, I highly recommend those options to those considering which options to get). Performance was great, and ran smoothly at very high speeds.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 12th October, 2003
13th Oct 2003, 12:39
I am mulling over purchasing a used Concorde this month. It is 1999 lx version with the infamous 2.7L. In your review I noticed there were no mentions of the notorious "sludge" or "freeze" problems that are plastered all over consumer sites about this car. The vehicle has 87K and is is good shape. Just wondering, since the mileage is near the same as yours, if anything that could've gone wrong, has done so and how it's going so far? Thanks much!!