1993 Eagle Vision TSi 3.5 V6
Summary:
Stay away from Chrysler..
Faults:
The car die suddenly and no mechanics can figured out what is the problem.
Trying to pinpoint the problem so far the following components has been changed: 2 times the crankshaft sensor, the camshaft sensor, ignition pack, harness wires and the ignition-injection electronic module and the problem still persist.
Transmission shift abruptly due to chronic design deficiencies of the electronic control module.
General Comments:
It is hard for me to understand how Chrysler is still in business after a long traditions of producing car like this.
The only good thing about this vehicle is the style and that was the trap in which I fell into.
The reliability is so inexistent that a Lada by comparison is a Rolls Royce.
I'm very curious to know what percentage of people buying a Chrysler product buy Chrysler again.
The quality of the dealer service is inexistent as well, I think any 10 years old kid knows about mechanic much more of this guys that you have to pay $90 per hour.
Never ever again an other American car, my next one will be a Nissan Maxima.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 6th December, 2002
3rd Aug 2007, 18:46
I currently own a 93 eagle vision and other than normal wear and tear this vehicle has been by far the best vehicle I've owned.
Since I got this vehicle 3 years and 140,000 km ago I have only had to replace the water pump and fuel pump. Both of which were very inexpensive, and very easy to change yourself.
I know some people have had problems with Chrysler's, but I've had problems with everything, but. The only vehicles I've been able to drive the way I do ARE Chrysler's. Ford's, Chev's, Even import cars couldn't take the abuse I've put my Chrysler's through.