1992 Ford Festiva L 1.3 Liter gasoline

Summary:

I would own them all if I could

Faults:

Rattle from the muffler.

Loud belt under the hood.

General Comments:

This little car was the best $150 I have ever spent. Handles well and moves pretty quick, not a better car on the market for every day driving in my opinion. Very easy on the wallet too, great on gas mileage and not too many repairs. It is definitely one of the best cars I have ever owned and I really hope that it isn't the last I own. If you see one on the side of the road with a For Sale sign, take immediate interest, give it a chance, and then make a decision. This car won't let you down.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st October, 2005

1992 Ford Festiva L 1.3 Liter

Summary:

It is good cheap transportation

Faults:

The exhaust rusted off of it.

The C.V. boot ripped open.

The master cylinder started to leak.

The bright lights quit working.

The dome light Just came on and would not turn off.

Had to put a new battery in it.

General Comments:

I love this car.

This car can park in the tightest spot.

My festiva gets about 28-30 miles to the gallon in town.

It has enough power.

My first test was 10 hours on the interstate at 80 mph.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 22nd March, 2005

1992 Ford Festiva L 1.2

Summary:

Most reliable, economic, inexpensive, easy to drive cars I have EVER owned!

Faults:

I rolled the thing once and it is still good!

General Comments:

This car gets around 40 MPG and is as good as the hybrid cars for gas consumption.

There is tremendous room in the car surprisingly. I got a 6' step ladder in it! It is a BIG box on tiny wheels.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st March, 2005

1992 Ford Festiva L 1.3L Fuel Injected

Summary:

Most dependable car I've owned!

Faults:

Burned out license plate light.

Heat shielding around exhaust system rattled... had to take it off. Works great now.

Back hatch rattled over bumps. Added extra weatherstripping and now it's good as new.

General Comments:

This car is just amazing. I bought it back in May of 2004 with 201,000 miles on it, and it was all smogged and ready to go for $600. Since then I put in $1400 into the car, upgrading the interior, getting new tires, new stereo system, tinting the windows. It's basically a new car now, other than some very slight dents hardly noticeable.

Since I've owned it it's run perfect. No problems whatsoever. Not even the "check engine" light came on yet. It's still on its original clutch and transmission with now 204,000 miles plus on it.

I would highly recommend getting one of these if you can find one in decent shape! They're worth it in the gas mileage alone (38-41 MPG average).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th December, 2004

17th Sep 2009, 11:29

So let me get this straight. You've owned the car for 3000 miles. That's an oil change interval. And it's the most dependable car you've owned? That says a lot. Probably not unrelated to the fact that your last car was an MG.

1992 Ford Festiva L 1.3

Summary:

Ford was STUPID to quit making these

Faults:

Brake Master Cylinder had to be replaced.

Serpentine belt squealed.

General Comments:

This is my second Festiva, and I really wish I hadn't given away the first one. I live in Hawaii, and with gas over $2 a gallon, this thing is a mileage champ! I get 38-40 mpg in combined city/highway driving. I know my Festy will always start and run.

The other one had AC, sure would be nice if this one did. Alas.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st May, 2004

22nd Oct 2005, 00:32

Ford wasn't smart to begin with. They wouldn't know a good car if it hit them.

1992 Ford Festiva GL 1.3L FI

Summary:

Plain cheap bulletproof transportation

Faults:

Rear wheel bearings have been a constant problem with this car. They are very difficult to adjust correctly. The torque values and readings are very unconventional. If these bearings are adjusted incorrectly they go bad very quickly.

The emergency brakes have also been difficult. Unfortunately emergency brake problems are easily confused with rear bearing problems. It is impossible to adjust the brakes without removing the drum, which makes it very difficult to adjust shoe dragging.

The brake disks cannot be removed from the front steering knuckles without a great deal of trouble. Make sure you get disks turned on the car during a brake job or you are going to be charged a great deal.

General Comments:

Other than the rear axle problems the car is great and very economical. It seems to usually get over 40 miles per gallon. In spite of the fact I am now over 126000 miles I am still on the same original clutch.

It is very reliable.

With its 5 speed manual transmission it is fast enough to stay out of trouble.

It is really too bad that this car never caught on with the public and Ford/KIA/Mazda did away with it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 12th March, 2004

13th Mar 2004, 18:57

The car had a replacement in 1994 called Aspire it used the same engine and transmission, it was heavier and very sluggish.