1989 Ford Ranger XLT 2.9L
Summary:
I like Ford Rangers, but this one has been a bad one
Faults:
The automatic transmission would not shift until 4,000 RPM's, and then started slipping real bad.
Radiator started leaking along the side.
Right front brake line started leaking were rubber meets metal.
Air conditioning sprung a leak and now will not hold any pressure in the system.
Plastic around seat-belts has cracked and made sharp edges.
General Comments:
Interior is very clean and worn well for the age of the truck. Dash is still in one piece with no cracks. No rips in the seats or carpet. Headliner still in place with no rips.
Body still in great condition with no rust.
2.9L provides okay power, but sucks gas as bad as an F150 V-8.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 16th February, 2005
3rd Jan 2008, 21:54
I agree completely with this review. I bought a Ranger of the same yr and model (except mine's 4x4) about 2 yrs ago for $1500. It was very well maintained and has given me no problems as I tool around the Northwest. It handles great in snow.
I was also frustrated with 15-18 mpg. My first tank of gas gave me 24 mpg, but that was because I was cautious about stomping on the gas and easing it through gear changes (automatic). It is extremely sluggish on acceleration so I got nowhere fast, and eventually had to stomp on the gas most of the time.
It has been a great vehicle to teach my 16 yr old to drive, because it is so slow and forgiving.
I think dependability and comfort are great and I like the way this model Ranger looks, but poor fuel efficiency and power are things to consider. This will be an excellent first car for my son.