1996 Ford Ranger XLT 2.3
Summary:
Underrated great little pickup
General Comments:
I recently sold my 1999 Toyota Tacoma 2.4 extra-cab. The Toyota was super clean and I mostly just drove it for pleasure.
Times have recently changed, and with the economy the way it is, I picked up a wood burning stove to supplement heating my house. I also decided to get rid of the Tacoma because I realized I could get a good price for it, which I did. I then started looking around for a reliable 2wd standard with air that I could load wood in and not worry about denting or dinging.
After a bit of research, I decided to go for the 2.3 Ranger ex-cab. I happened to find a great deal on one near me. At first I was a bit surprised by what seemed to be a great lack of power when comparing the Ranger to my former Tacoma, but after owning it for over a month now, I've gotten used to the gears and power band, and everything's fine. I think this little truck will take me well into the 200 thousand mile range without many problems.
I actually enjoy around town driving in it better then my Tacoma, huh, who woulda thought?
This truck won't win you any races, but that's not what I bought it for, and at a fraction what a 96 Tacoma would have cost. Mileage is also very good;25mpg all around driving.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know
Review Date: 19th October, 2008
20th Oct 2008, 15:51
It sounds like you made a very smart decision. I've owned 4 Rangers since 1992 and never had a problem with any of them. My 2.3's got 29mpg on the highway at the speed limit.
I no longer go camping, so I traded my last one in on a 2007 Mustang. It was a V-6 automatic and only got about 24mpg highway.
The October 2007 Consumer Reports featured a Ranger that had over 488,000 trouble-free miles, so you should have LOTS of miles left. My family's company uses Rangers, and 300,000 miles out of the little 2.3 5-speeds is not at all uncommon.