1997 Ford Ranger XLT 2.3L
Summary:
I have driven vehicles for 40 years and it is one of the most favorite trucks I have ever had
Faults:
Windshield wipers come on occasionally without prompting.
Dome light switch broke.
Center console broke off the seat.
Driver seat settled on left side. Spring weakened.
General Comments:
My ranger has had outstanding reliability over 10.5 years of steady driving.
Minimum maintenance has been required. No unpredictable problems over the years. Simply replaced the battery, tires, fluids, air cleaner occasionally, etc.
With the 5 speed manual I have received excellent MPG over the years, 25-28 MPG.
It is underpowered and I have to peddle hard on hills or in passing traffic. Not a lot of zip.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 19th October, 2007
8th Jan 2007, 09:48
There are no better small trucks than the Ranger. That's why virtually every company on the planet that uses small trucks chooses Ranger. Going 300,000 miles on a Ranger with no problems is very typical. They are inexpensive to purchase, are very comfortable, get awesome gas mileage and require virtually zero maintenance. The 4's do require timing belts at around 120,000 miles (the manual says 60,000, but you can easily double that), but the all-iron 3.0 can go 300,000 miles with nothing but tires, batteries, oil changes and air filters. Since 1992 I've had both the 4 and the 3.0. Neither ever required a single repair ever.