1992 Geo Metro 1.0L 3 cly.

Summary:

A reliable Bargain

Faults:

The Uni-body rusted on the passengers side front and through off alignment.

Minor matinence only requirment.

General Comments:

A fat little car with out all the fat. They are small, but there is room in side.

I wish they were still in production more than anybody. I am a metro lover for life. The are reliable good handling cars that get great gas mileage!

When you first start diving them you are instantly hooked because they are fun to drive and do not cost much to keep running. I am able to do most major upkeep myself.

They also fit any where so when a person is double parked you can ease on in next to them when no one else could. This is one of my favorite options.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th November, 2003

26th Jan 2005, 10:25

Use caution around the double parker the metro is lite and can be shoved anywhere.

1992 Geo Metro Base 1.0

Summary:

I wish they still made them, as I would buy one

Faults:

At about 3500 miles the brakes started to shimmy on front. Although I am hard on the vehicle the original clutch lasted 111,000 miles, but it wasn't wore out, but the springs broke in it on the clutch disc. Radiator plugged up at 140,000, had to change.

General Comments:

This is indisputably the best car I have ever had and I have had over 100. the original battery lasted 101/2 yrs (185,000mi). the starter, alternator, rear brakes, wheel bearings, drive axles, struts, steering parts, are all original and still perfect. It has no rust, but the engine is weak on 1 cyl (75psi comp) which rough idles with air on. It ran 100 mph when new, and would get 3 gears of scratch, it will still run over 90. If you have a cruise the car is very comfortable in the front with plenty of room. Interior still does not have rips in anything. It has a real headliner which will not fall apart in 10 years like other cars. Paint is still good except for hood where rocks have beat it. I love this car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th April, 2003

1992 Geo Metro Base 4 Door Hatchback 1.0 Liter 3 Cylinder

Summary:

The Small Car with Big Ideas!

Faults:

Water pump leaked after a while.

Starter failed; replaced.

Interior damage when car was bought, but it was easily repaired.

Various O-rings and seals (not main engine seal) began to leak after a while. All easily fixed.

A/C relays failed, replaced with junk yard ones, as they are $70 from Chevy.

General Comments:

Extremely fun to drive.

Easy to work on and repair, however parts are generally expensive.

Engine noise is very apparent in the passenger compartment at speeds in excess of 60 MPH.

Car tracks superbly for such a light car, however gusts at high altitudes are really noticeable.

Highly suggested as a teenager's first car, or as a second car for a multi car family.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 18th March, 2003

1992 Geo Metro 1.0L

Summary:

Cheap on everything, but MAN is it tough!

Faults:

When it rained, the engine would only work on 2 cylinder, if not 1.

Radio cassette too fast, music distorted.

Wheel Bearing fails often.

Very cheaply made.

Engine blew, amateur owner (not me) kept pedal to the metal when cold start to make it warm up faster (not me, I swear).

Low trunk space.

Low space, period.

General Comments:

READ THE FOLLOWING, YOU WON'T BELIEVE IT, BUT I SWEAR, IT'S TRUE!!!

Though everyone I know (including me) hates this car, and it is extremely cheaply done, it has a good point to it, because it's so cheaply assembled, a loader rolled over the front right corner... it was back on the road the very next day!!! The shaft just poped out as well as the front right wheel support, and the bumper just poped out (did they use screws at all to make this car?) even the light still works, A LOADER PASSED ON IT!!!

It's very cheap on gas, i'll give it that, and we hit the STUNNING high speed OF... 150kph, downhill. Good gas mileage, pathetic speed.

But at least it got us where we wanted to go... most of the time.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 7th March, 2003