1993 GMC Sonoma 2.8 V6
Summary:
The gas mileage of a V-8, power of a Geo Metro, and the utility of a compact station wagon
Faults:
Inner and outer tie rods.
Pitman arm.
Electrical gremlins all over.
Smokes a lot.
Both door handles are busted.
General Comments:
Rusty, drives and runs like a vehicle with twice the miles. The ride is about like a car instead of a truck, which is good since the thing can haul about as much as a Ford Escort station wagon. Motor puffs a lot of blue smoke. The motor is a gutless little turd that can hardly get out of its own way. On the plus side, it gets about as good of mileage as a fullsized pickup with a V-8 (18 mpg). The truck has been reliable (it's only saving grace).
Being a small shortbox with a willy-nilly engine, it isn't real useful when it comes to actually using it as a pick-up. A fullsized Caprice wagon with a V-8 would be a more practical and get better mileage, with something resembling acceleration to boot.
The door handles are crap, both of them busted (a very common GM problem). Somebody ghetto-rigged a coat hanger around the inside door handle on the passenger side. One has to make sure to leave some of the wire sticking out of the door.
The driver's side window doesn't stay on the track half the time, so I wedged a water bottle between the door and the window. The water bottle method of holding up the window adds loads of class and has the added benefit of allowing a car thief an easy way into the truck. Most of the time though the door doesn't latch anyway, so one can easily just give the door a little tug and it'll open up. Unfortunately it opens up while turning right as well, so this is one truck you want to be sure to be wearing a seat belt while you're driving it.
There are a lot of lights that don't work in the truck, and the rear running lights no longer work either, so I don't drive at night if at all possible. If I do drive at night, I gently rest my foot on the brake just enough to turn on the brake lights to give the truck the appearance of having tail lights.
Other than making sure the truck is safe to drive (like replacing very worn out front end components), I plan on sticking exactly zero dollars into it.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 8th June, 2010
4th Apr 2015, 15:12
Well, let's see...the reviewer indicates the truck was purchased 17 years after it was built and with 125K miles on it.
Yep, looks they "bought it used", alright. Do you really think someone buying a vehicle like that is going to pay to "have it checked by a reliable mechanic" before purchase?
11th Jun 2010, 13:38
You did not specify if you had done regular maintenance, or if you had bought it used?
If you did not do regular maintenance or did not have it checked by a reliable mechanic before buying it used, then the fault is yours.