1988 Honda Civic DX 1.5 L

Faults:

The head gasket went at 252000.

Driver's seat is worn.

New halfshafts were installed at 252000 as well as rear control arms, brakes front and rear, body work around the wheels, new rims and performance tires, 5 way adjustable shocks and sport springs, converted the vehicle from an automatic to a 5 speed manual at 273000 miles, and I also installed ureothane enriched bushings.

General Comments:

This is an excellent car that will easily make it to 300,000 miles.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 12th June, 2001

1988 Honda Civic Hatchback 1.6 liter 4 cylinder

Summary:

A very quick little car

Faults:

So far, nothing has gone wrong with the car.

General Comments:

I bought it from a friend who bought the car in '88. It was just routinely taken care of, and never abused more than burn-outs. Compared to my last car, this is heaven.

If you find a car like this in good condition, I seriously recommend you buy it. I only bought the car because my brother had an '88 Civic DX hatchback, and said it was the best car he has ever owned.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd May, 2001

21st Apr 2005, 20:40

I agree with this comment. I just bought a 1988 Honda Civic DX, because I needed a car that I could pay cash on. A buddy turned me on to honda's saying they will run forever. This was a good one, clean no leaks. I've owned Toyotas and many American cars, but this one seems to be very well made.

3rd Mar 2007, 20:31

I have a 1988 honda civic DX hatch back, Just coming up on 500,000 miles. Runs great still and steering and suspension is super tight. I would trust taking this car any where. 43 mpg is great too.

1988 Honda Civic LX 1.5

Summary:

Good car for the price

Faults:

Crack in the radiator. Had to be replaced.

Fuel injectors wore out.

General Comments:

Other than the 2 problems that I have had, the Civic is an all around reliable car. A great car to start with. I enjoy every minute of driving it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th March, 2001

1988 Honda Civic Si Hatchback 1.6L PGM-FI

Summary:

Undestructable and fast!

Faults:

Overall I had absolutely no problems with the car, other than the usual timing belt, fuel pump and muffler that always has to be replaced.

General Comments:

A very speedy and economical car that sees no end!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 20th February, 2001

1988 Honda Civic DX 4 door 1.5

Summary:

Runs forever

Faults:

CV boots - Honda design.

Rotors - Honda design.

Radiator - plastic on the top.

Driveshaft - cause by the CV boot.

Alternator - lifetime warranty.

Catalytic converter - after 200k it's about time.

Shocks/springs - Honda design.

I would not buy or recommend an automatic, because of the 4 cylinders, most of the car's problems occur in the automatic.

General Comments:

Honda service in San Diego sucks. When I owned the car, I was pretty gullible. Factory service replaced everything and was fine, and charged me for a recall. I had a factory service tell me to replace the air conditioning for $750, verdict was a loose clutch nut. Now I do my own work.

I have not been using my car due to funding, but it lasted this long, it has been through CO, AZ, NM, NA, and all over California. Snow or shine. It also tows jet skies.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st December, 2000

1988 Honda Civic DX hatchback 1.5

Summary:

Reliable, economical, and a delight to drive

Faults:

Finally at 196,500 miles things are starting to go bad. The transmission has just failed. The alternator failed at 190,000 miles. The other repairs have been several batteries, about 4 sets of tires, about 4 brake services and one brake system overhaul, replaced struts once, 3 mufflers, replaced front axles at 175,000, all four wheel bearings, 3 timing belts, one water pump, and the front ball joints. I do all my own repairs, and try to catch stuff before it becomes a problem.

General Comments:

A more reliable car I cannot imagine. The only down side is she is finally wearing out. Fuel economy has always been better than EPA ratings, usually 34 city and about 38 highway, not bad for an automatic. I wish I had kept the body up better, it is starting to rust through around the rear wheel wells.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th April, 2000

1988 Honda Civic

Faults:

Burned oil so bad after 130,000 miles, had engine rebuilt.

General Comments:

Small & cheap. Change oil every 2,000 miles. Bounces a lot going down highway (light & cheap). Engine struggles after getting 3 more people in car (lawnmower engine).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 10th November, 1998

29th May 2001, 13:44

If you properly take care of your Honda it won't be like that. Mine has over 200 000 on it and still can give a Neon (R/T) a run with 4 adults weighing 200 a piece in it. And it isn't an Si model.

15th Aug 2009, 19:06

"light & cheap"

Exactly, this is why it is a base model of a cheap brand. It's light and underpowered so it gets good gas mpg. If you wanted balls you should have picked a V6 or V8. Maybe a Camaro?