1999 Honda Civic Si honda

Summary:

Nice beginner's car, not too powerful

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

Although reliable, the engine leaves me with a lot to be desired, not much torque and 160 horses, it's almost nothing compared to my 93 built mr2 turbo. but it would be good for anyone looking for a beater. one other reason I sold the Civic, is because I grew tired of seeing other cars like it on every corner. definitely worth buying if you want to fit in with the rest of the crowd, if not buy a Toyota.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 26th April, 2002

4th Aug 2004, 09:36

I would like to bring to your attention that the Acura Rsx type-s provides 100hp per litre as well (200hp in total) and has much more torque than the Si (or SIR in Canada)

I have no problem with the civic si, but please people... stop thinking it s a race car it s a Honda Civic (America`s family car), you WILL get your ass whooped by a lot of cars, and I won t hesitate to embarrass you with my RSX-s it s very easy.

4th Oct 2007, 01:35

I've been debating getting a Focus or a Civic. We already have a Focus in the family and it's proven to be very reliable, but I like Honda hatchbacks; however I'm not willing to pay considerably more for a Civic because of its reputation, because I don't believe it. Honda is not Mercedes (old Mercedes when they used to over-engineer).

And to the fella who went on and on about the B16 engine: stock four-cylinder engines do not yield 75% power increase from a supercharger, this includes the "mighty" b16. I encourage your enthusiasm, but be realistic; 30-35% is the average power increase from the addition of a supercharger.

9th Nov 2011, 17:29

Engine torque doesn't mean anything when it comes to racing. It is good for being able to accelerate briskly without downshifting. When it comes to racing, horsepower is king. I can get wheel torque by using a lower gear in the transmission, that is why we have transmissions; to multiply torque. That is why a Civic Si with 111 foot pounds of torque can accelerate with a V6 Mustang with 220 foot pounds of torque. The Mustang has twice the torque and only a couple hundred pounds more weight. If engine torque were the only factor that mattered, the Mustang would leave the Civic like it was sitting still.

1999 Honda Civic DX 1.6 SOHC

Summary:

Did not meet my expectations of what a Honda should be

Faults:

Having O2 sensor replaced at 48,500 - $350.

Lots of door dings. Sometimes I wonder if the wind will put a dent in the door.

The dome light is erratic.

The belt (s) had to be adjusted.

The chassis creaks.

The adhesive holding the door trim to the door tends to melt off in the Texas sun.

General Comments:

This car is slow as molasses, but I thought it was supposed to be reliable.

Ah I see now, reliable until the warranty expires.

The engine runs well though, and it actually handles very well for a car of this class.

I got mine cheap, no frills, just Air Conditioning, which could cool off faster.

There is a lot of wind noise in the car though, and every now and again the antenna cuts out, so I can't drown it out with the radio.

I will be stuck with this car for a while, so I hope this sort of behaviour does not continue. I have a real problem with Honda scheduled maintenance, basically, unless your mileage is at a multiple of 30,000, they charge you about $96 for an oil change and tire rotation.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 2nd April, 2002

4th Jun 2002, 21:14

I drive 4 hours a day so its GREAT on gas, but its so slow and the performance parts for it are really expensive. but if your good on your general maintance it SHOULD last a long time.

9th Jul 2002, 09:40

Maintenance? Go to WalMart for a $16 oil change, buy your tires somewhere like Sears or Sams Club where you get lifetime rotation / spin balancing for a one time cost - $16 per tire at Sears, included in the mounting price at Sam's. Much better than the $40 the dealer charges every time.

View 5 more comments