2005 Hyundai Santa Fe V6 GL AWD 2.7L V6
Summary:
Good so far
Faults:
Nothing yet I don't think. I've only had the car for less than 2900 Km (just over 2000 Miles!).
That said, I get a weird vibration when my vehicle gets up to 15 km/h. Probably something to do with an diagnostic test.
General Comments:
My transition from a 2000 Grand Am GT to a 2005 Hyundai Santa Fe is the reflection from a single guy to a family man. That said, the transition from a "Sports-like Car" to "Family Vehicle" was relatively painless when going to a Santa Fe.
My review is very much a comparison between what I know best.. GM and the new Hyundai Santa Fe.
My marks for the vehicle overall are still high, but I thought I would give a balanced comparison.
Pros:
-Handling
-Cost
-Lots of features for the money.
Cons:
-Not really a rocket on the road.
-But getting around 19 MPG
-Miss some of the basic features from my GM
-Terrible choice in seat color (too light!)
Pros:
The 4WD GL handles VERY, VERY well. I have driven through a few snow storms already and the car held the road beautifully. The overall feeling is solid. In Canada the idea of getting a 4WD anything for less than 30,000 Canadian just doesn't seem possible. The Santa Fe IS the cheapest 4WD you can get and it drives well. I was really impressed to find that the Santa Fe had finally added ABS and Traction Control (TC) to models other than the GLS. Both ABS and TC are features I wanted to get in my new vehicle. Also included is a car alarm system. Which isn't spectacular, but it is great to see it included at no extra cost. Lastly, I enjoy the MP3 quite a bit. The truth is, with the MP3 player I see no benefit to having a multidisk player now. The MP3 player can play more music AND displays the song title.
Cons:
I have to start with seat color. It is far too light for a seat that you sit in everyday. It shows the dirt far too easily. Otherwise the seats are nice.
Going from a Grand Am GT was noticable. The Santa Fe weights a lot more than the Grand Am and you can feel it. That said, I don't miss the "torque steer" I use to get from my Grand Am.
Now about the basic features. I just for the life of me cannot understand why they are not included. Features like:
Doors automatically lock when you put the car in gear.
Headlights come on automatically at dark.
Doors unlock when you turn the car off.
Not all the buttons are lit up at night (the Power Window lockout and Cruise control buttons).
I still miss these features and they do not add much to the cost of the vehicle. Perhaps we will see these features in years to come.
Lastly, I will see in time, but the fuel economy for all highway driving is not as good as stated. I am getting only around 19 MPG. Time will tell if this number gets higher as the engine gets broken in.
Overall, at over 2000 Miles (2900 Km) I am still happy with my Santa Fe.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 5th January, 2005
19th Apr 2006, 12:21
***16 Month UPDATE***
Well I have now had the car for over 16 months and have driven over 50,000 Km. I am still happy so far, despite a few minor problems along the way.
I have had to have the Dealer replace:
-The car radio (it stopped reading CD's)
-The Fan speed switch (which coincidently went right after they replaced the radio, I suspect it may be related to the taking the dash apart)
-The Cruise control switch
-The plastic back of the driver seat.
The list is a bit scary, but at the same time none of the problems have affected my ability to drive to work.
The Santa Fe really earned it's keep when a driver decided to drive into the back of me on a Highway. I was doing the speed limit at the time. I guess she was travelling faster than that. I didn't slow down or anything.
Nevertheless, we did great, the Santa Fe didn't lose control at all. And the damage to my vehicle was minimal compared to that of the car that drove into me.
Lastly, Fuel Economy. It isn't great at all.
I still, for the most part, average 20 MPG. If I just changed my oil, got the air tire pressure at exactly 30 PSI, and I drive a long distance at exactly the speed limit, without stopping at all. I can crank out the stated 27 MPG. But most of the time I don't get that kind of fuel economy.
Most vehicles I have owned were more forgiving when it came to achieving the stated MPG.
I guess the bottom line is, if you want good fuel economy don't buy a SUV, even a small one (but we already knew that right?)