1993 Lexus ES 300 V 6 fuel injected
Summary:
Good low end Luxury type car
Faults:
Dash board indicator lights went out twice.extremly costly
Radiator tanks cracked causing over heating at 90k.Installed a 3core from a Camry, lots better
Engine mounts broke and replaced at 70k.
Alternator/regulator burnt out at 71k.
Antenna malfunction at 89k.
Transmission shift problems at 100k.
General Comments:
For 6'2" people tight to sit into, once in leg room OK, head room short.
With 4 people in the cabin, and some luggage in trunk, vehicle bottoms out often.
Front seats with lower lombard adjuster are very comfortable.
Sound system very nice.6 CD changer stops functioning in the summer heat.
This vehicle travels well at 80+ speeds on freeways.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 27th January, 2007
19th Jun 2007, 14:38
Wow, all the yellow smiley faces for these older Lexus ES300s is REALLY misleading when you start reading the reviews regarding the type of problems they have. I'm shocked (and quite frankly disgusted) to read review after review stating that the transmission crapped out around 100k miles and numerous issues with oil leaks. I think people don't realize how crappy of a car it truly is because they drive so nicely. It's misleading. My current '89 Chrysler Lebaron (yes, you read that correctly!) has NO OIL LEAKS and I've never had to replace seals. The transmission is original. And my oh-so-antiquated traditionally lit gauges don't give me issues. Even if they did, it's $2 to replace the bulb. These Lexus cars sound highly overrated, just like my old '87 Mercedes 300E was. Man, that was a truly unreliable car and NOT worth the money. My experience with Volvos has been better than most reviews I'm reading about these ES300s. I was considering one, but I think I've changed my mind. The '85 Volvo 240 I had several years ago was an exceptionally reliable car when I sold it at 164k miles. All it ever needed was 1 inner tie-rod, a new master cylinder, brakes, and tires in 164k miles of driving. Only reason I bought it because my Mom had just sold her '89 Volvo 740 turbo with 224k miles, with no issues from the engine or transmission. She replaced it with a '95 Volvo 940, currently with 164k miles and she's done NO WORK to it yet! Yes, the ES300 sounds very overrated with failing transmissions, failing $600 gauges, and issues with engine leaks. I'm royally unimpressed and dissapointed. Well at least its a pretty car.