2005 Mazda 3 2.3L I4
Summary:
All it needed was boost and better fuel economy - then it would have been PERFECT!
Faults:
There was a "check engine" light almost immediately after I bought it, and it turns out the O2 sensor is on its way out. There is also considerable wheel vibration while driving at highway speeds, but it tapers off if you go faster.
Additionally, the car has had front and side impacts; the former deployed its airbags in its previous ownership; the ultimate result of this is that the horn doesn't work. The aforementioned side impact has resulted in some VERY minute rust bubbles forming on the B-pillar, about the size of a dime. It's not that bad, so I don't worry about it, because in spite of these, the car is clean.
General Comments:
I was cross-shopping a number of cars to replace my Jeep when I drove home from Northern to West Coast Canada. This one fit our budget and was (and arguably still is) a solid driver with TWICE the fuel economy of my previous vehicle; however, the fuel economy could still be better and the car is sadly sluggish off the line, likely owing to the car's weight (3,400 lbs. is NOT small). However, it is versatile as it can fit me, my now-expecting wife-to-be, our dog, and it STILL has room for a baby seat in the back, plus passengers or cargo.
By far, this car's greatest selling feature is its driving dynamics - that light throttle-off oversteer, tenacious grip and (wheel vibration aside) highway manners make this car one of my favourites out of all the cars I've owned. The car's MacPherson Strut front and Multi-Link rear suspension gives it poise and comfort worthy of rally driving! I do wonder what owning the MazdaSpeed 3 would have been like...
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 2nd March, 2014
19th Aug 2015, 20:48
Right, so a bit of a follow-up - the car now has over 210,000 km on it. Changed oil and filter, but made an important discovery: the car does NOT have a 2.0L engine as I previously though. I did a bit of research and discovered that this model actually is a 2.3L. Much to my chagrin, the filter I purchased to replace the old was incompatible.