2010 Mazda 3 i Sport 2.0
Summary:
The car is "Rubbish"
Faults:
Rear shocks failed at 40000.
Brakes required replacement at 48000.
New center console fitted at 12000.
Fuel mileage is terrible... average 8.6 to 10.2 liters per 100 Kilometers.
Transmission clunks & miss-shifts.
Belts squeal - new belt fitted, no difference.
Timing chain rattles.
Electronic throttle positioner operates erratically at times.
The car rattles, & is not well fitted together.
General Comments:
This car is not an economical vehicle. It uses a tremendous amount of fuel for a small engine. The adverts for this model tend to indicate that the car will deliver good fuel economy... In truth, the car uses more fuel than most vehicles twice the size, & with larger engines.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 28th February, 2012
29th Feb 2012, 20:56
Wow! My 1989 Crown Victoria gets better gas mileage, and it's a huge, rear wheel drive, V8 land yacht, over 3000 pounds of steel.
Who would have thought?
Maybe there is something wrong with the car, like fuel injectors or something. I had a Mitsubishi 6 cylinder that burned more gas than a V-8 before; the engine was tired and worn out.