1996 Nissan 300ZX 2+2 3.0
Summary:
It is great just to watch it sit in my garage!
Faults:
Nothing has gone wrong with the car.
General Comments:
This car is a beauty to drive. It handles like a sports car, looks like a sports car yet is built to last a lifetime.
It rides nice on the highway and especially at high speeds, +65. Mileage, MPG, is about 24 in-town and 28 on the highway.
The car does ride low to the ground and some have difficulty getting in and out. Drive-thru restaurants and ATM machines can be a problem due to the height of the car.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 11th January, 2004
29th Apr 2004, 09:26
Just to define the "2 + 2" model of Z car: This model has something that can be called a back seat. I've never experienced it myself, but hear that it's good for very small children and short people with no legs. The other models don't even pretend to have a back seat.
31st Dec 2004, 21:17
I just bought a 1992 300zx 2+2 and I myself can say that there is not much of a backseat, little children's can fit back there, but it is mostly for insurance purposes...
3rd Apr 2011, 07:39
This reviewer had an X Type Jag, and finds that the 300zx is better. OK, that's it, I'm buying one. I was looking at a VW Jetta, but there are a number of people disappointed. I would stick to the 300ZX to update my beloved Alfa Romeo.
3rd Apr 2011, 11:35
I saved insurance on buying a new 82 280zx because I had the. 2+2. No longer a 2 seater. I was in my late 20s and single, so that was a factor then.
15th Apr 2004, 16:35
What exactly is a "2+2"?