1989 Pontiac Bonneville SSE 3.8
Summary:
Fun good looking car
Faults:
Mass air flow sensor.
Oil pressure sending unit.
O2 sensor.
Clogged catalytic converter.
Broken antenna.
Speedometer broken.
Compass / vehicle info doesn't work.
Sunroof doesn't properly seal.
Power windows slow.
Power locks barely work.
Stock speakers all were garbage.
Doesn't like to start in cold weather.
Cigarette lighter plug broken.
Wipe blade function sucks.
Air ride leaks.
Passenger CV joint.
Poor on fuel.
Headlights break from being glass.
Hood has brutal cracked paint.
A/C doesn't work.
Headlight spray container broken.
Rust.
Hood latch doesn't open well.
Doors are hard to open.
General Comments:
My first was a black 88 SSE and both back doors wouldn't open and the air ride was broken.
Engine went around 360km.
2019 and my red SSE is officially 30 years old with only 178000km. The car always has problems, but it's like no other vehicle. So much style.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 4th March, 2019
8th May 2011, 23:13
Volvos do not have a great repair record. I dislike Swedish cars because they are harder to maintain and less reliable right from the get-go. The Bonneville is a better car, largely because parts are cheaper and they are less complex. Once a Volvo develops a problem, you either need a lot of money saved up to fix it, or prepare to start riding a bus. My mom has a Volvo. It's falling to crap mechanically. The Saab my dad had was high maintenance and unsettling to drive. Money pits they are, and resale value is terrible. Pontiacs don't have the image of sophistication or upscale coolness as a Volvo, but at least it's cheaper to keep one driving.