1990 Pontiac Sunbird LE turbo 2.0

Summary:

A high performance, reliable car!

Faults:

The only technical problems I have had with the car was that the window cables sometimes get loose from opening and closing the doors, but that's easily fixable.

General Comments:

The car has always started every time I run it. Even in freezing temperatures.

The car is very reliable, and even looks good.

Handles very well, and can enjoy every ride.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 5th September, 2003

1990 Pontiac Sunbird GT 2.0 turbo

Summary:

Much better quality than the Sunfire

Faults:

Computer failure when it was new (less than 500 miles)

Cracked head at 80K, due to failed radiator cooling fan and a very hot day in a Chicago traffic jam. I consider this to be my fault, as I knew it was overheating and kept going.

Other than normal maintenance items, absolutely no other problems.

General Comments:

Very Fast and Good Looking car! I always have liked it - still do.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd April, 2003

17th May 2006, 15:26

I like the look of the car and want to make it into a hot rod with a different type of V-6 from chevrolet.

1990 Pontiac Sunbird GT 2.0 turbo

Summary:

Sport Compacts beware!

Faults:

Replaced Clutch & Transmission, about 6 months after buying it..

Turbo is not working properly, either this is a vacuum problem or a waste-gate flow problem.

General Comments:

This has been a great car.

The only reason I'm on my second one is because some guy fiquredturning left into me was a good idea.

This a quick, and great handling car.

I plan on doing a total top and bottom rebuild on the engine, putting custom headers on, and rebuilding, or getting a new turbo.

No, I;m not crazy, but I want to show some of these guys that a domestic car can bejust as good, if not better then Civics, Preludes and such.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 25th February, 2003

1990 Pontiac Sunbird GT 2.0 turbo

Summary:

Buying a Turbo Sunbird is a mistake!!!

Faults:

Replaced exhaust system (whole system just rotted out) at 110,000km.

Replaced water pump at 145,000km.

Blew a head gasket that also cracked the aluminum cylinder head at 150,000km (found out from engine re-builder that it this wasn't the first time the head gasket had blown on this car)

General Comments:

Not a bad performer, but Turbo took a bit to kick in, relatively poor acceleration until over 60km/h.

Not the most comfortable seating, hard on back, but spacious drivers area.

Factory sunroof never leaked, never was a problem.

I would never, ever buy a turbo car again, brutally expensive to repair and not worth the performance gains.

Terribly unreliable as well, the 4 cylinder turbo in the Sunbird is infamous for it's unreliability, which, unfortunately I didn't know about before I bought the car.

I cut my losses after paying for the rebuilt head and quickly sold the car, I knew there were other problems mounting (alternator, belts, bearings, and more).

Otherwise I was quite happy with the car, it has nice lines, looks sporty, decent performance, but I should have bought the 3.1 V6 powered Sunbird GT.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 4th February, 2003

6th Jun 2003, 06:02

I have a sun-bird gt turbo 1990 and its the best car I've owned. its fast and sporty, the turbo adds many extra horses, I've never lost a race.

26th Apr 2004, 08:06

I own the 1990 GT Turbo. I have replaced the head gaskets and headers many times. I love the power this car has though. I also think that it is a fairly decent vehicle when it comes to fuel consumption. I have put out a lot of money for it, but it is worth it.

2nd Nov 2006, 09:44

I have a few postings on this site I'm the writer of THIS CAR IS WORTH EVERY PENNY and yes I also own the 2.0 sunbird gt turbo. If driven properly this car will atleast keep up to the 3.1. The turbo adds amazing power gain in the small 2.0 engine and I feel in a pick between the two motors I would go for the 2.0 all the way unless your getting to the 3.1 out of a Z24.