2005 Subaru Impreza 2.5 RS 2.5 Gas

Summary:

Unreliable

Faults:

Blown head gasket at 98000 kms, and no help from Subaru for repairs.

General Comments:

I've had this car for about five years, and had purchased it used from a older couple with only 12,000 Kms.

Earlier this year, my wife told me that the temp gauge had been spiking, and she was worried about it. I had a look underneath the car, and discovered that the head gaskets are leaking, and coolant is slowly dripping from the block. Brought it into the Subaru dealer, and had them look at it; the service manager confirmed that I had a leaky head gasket. The car was out of warranty for about 3 months with 97,000kms on it, so I was told to contact Subaru of Canada. A few days later, they denied my claim, even though there are countless of Subaru's with this engine that have developed blown head gaskets. I will never buy a Subaru again.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 30th October, 2010

8th Jan 2011, 23:26

Regarding Subaru's head gasket issue:

Our 2000 Outback blew the left gasket at 101,000 kms, no warranty and thus $1100 to fix.

Our 2002 Forester blew both gaskets at 86,000 kms, but after five years, so again no warranty and a $2400 bill in total (including car rental for 5 days).

More recently, my sister's 2005 Impreza, a car we bought because all reports indicated the head gasket problem solved in 2004, has also blown its left gasket, at 59,000 kms (and again, no warranty as the five years has expired). It turns out that her 2005 Impreza was really manufactured in May of 2004, and so quite possibly a 2004 with a 2005 VIN.

Does anyone out there have a Subie built as early as the 5th month of the previous model year? I thought most automakers don't start production for the upcoming year until around August, and I've looked at dozens of manufacture dates, and haven't seen one as early as ours. Consumer Reports indicates a LOT of problems with the '04s, but very, very few with the '05 (the '04s receive the worst rating for engine major, the '05s receive the second highest, so quite a contrast).

Needless to say, we are thoroughly done with Subaru, and went from being the ideal Subaru "poster family" to very serious ambassadors of ill-will (and we've owned 7 Subarus total since 1980). I bet we will cost Subaru many, many times in lost sales vs what they've cost us in blown head gasket repairs, by the time we are finished telling everyone we can of our experiences.

We were okay with the first gasket on the Outback, peeved at the second, but enraged at the third.

9th Jun 2011, 22:54

Agree. Our 2005 Impreza 2.5 Wagon had heating issues from the 2nd year of ownership. It over-heated at highway speeds at that time, and all Subaru would cover was a $25 radiator cap.

As soon as the five year warranty period was up, it turned out to be a $1,600 head gasket job. Pathetic.

I'm moving on to a new car company.

2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi H4 2.5L turbo

Summary:

One of the fastest 4 doors for the price

Faults:

Rear differential broke at 22k, possibly abuse by the previous owner. Replaced under warranty.

Possible DCCD issues, unsure.

General Comments:

Stock, the car is modestly quick. It handles pretty damn well. It is quite easy to make the car quicker. A full exhaust and a few other parts plus a pro-tune can yield 100hp over stock, reliably. After that, it's going to cost many thousands to make more power.

Stock seats are terrible, worse I have ever felt. I replaced them with fixed back racing seats as soon as I could.

I like the car, and the Subaru community is great, and helpful. But, I'm really sick of these fan boys saying how much better the STi is than the Evo. Out of the box, or even when you begin modding, the Evo makes a better racing car. Evos have stronger motors, make way more power than the STi on the stock turbo, and has better seats. Not to mention the Evo handles much better stock, it has more aggressive suspension, a quicker steering rack and better AWD system. Take it from someone who has driven both.

So, for the track/pure performance, the Evo is a better car. Now, for a daily driver that sees occasional track days, then it's really up to you. Honestly, one of the main reasons I got the STi instead of the Evo is because the STi has much much better mid range (aka more torque), something important to me. Also the same year Evo is not as safe. If you're going to stay stock, or close to stock, the Evo has a much much better warranty.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 24th March, 2010