1992 Toyota Tercel DX 1.5 petrolium

Summary:

This car is economically fun

Faults:

- The radiator (150000KM)

- Constant velocity joints were clicking a little so I replaced them (160000KM)

- Clutch master piston (Hydraulic clutch) 140000KM

- Fuel line leaked, but wasn't rusty (145000KM)

- Head gasket needed replacing, simply two bolts (165000KM)

- Starter needed replacing (170000KM)

General Comments:

I love this car; it is awesome to drive and is very reliable. It is surprisingly fast for 1.5L. It is a taut car that has never needed any major work yet, and it doesn't burn oil.

It is loud at high speeds, and at 150km/h it gets some speed wobble. I only have regular tires rated at 110km (they're tiny).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 1st November, 2004

1st Nov 2004, 22:32

With a manual they are peppy enough at low speeds. My friend had a '92 tercel 5 speed, and 0-60km/h it would be side-by-side with my '92 automatic Mazda Protege, although I'd pull away noticeably over 60km/h.

I am surprised you got it up to 150 though. lol. They don't have much punch from 3rd gear onward. Also, I wouldn't worry too much about the tire ratings. I've been up to 190km/h on 120km/h rated tires, although I certainly don't recommend that :)

1992 Toyota Tercel DX 1.5

Summary:

A nice car

Faults:

Bought the car used, needed new tires and that was it.

General Comments:

Cheap alternative to my domestic Chevy truck which guzzles gas. Have owned lots of toyota's and this one ranks right up there in terms of quality and reliablity.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st June, 2004

1992 Toyota Tercel DX 1.5

Summary:

Its worth its price

Faults:

Nothing has gone bad with this car yet. I guess I will have to have the brakes overhauled, but that's it.

General Comments:

The car is pretty economical.

It's a great first car.

Reliable and cheap on gas I love it.

I wish Toyota brings out a newer version of this car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th June, 2004

1992 Toyota Tercel Standard

Summary:

This car is reliable and a bargain to maintain

Faults:

The driver seat ripped, and the seat belt frayed.

I had to get a new radiator and replace valve cover gasket.

General Comments:

I'm very tough on my car and I've had to have very little replaced in the 12 years I've had it.

The work that I needed to get done was cheap.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 11th May, 2004

1992 Toyota Tercel DX 1.5

Summary:

Very reliable

Faults:

My seats have shown some wear.

The back seat opens into the trunk, but the latch broke, so that doesn't work anymore.

There were some other mechanical difficulties, I can't remember them all, it has been a while.

General Comments:

This is an awesome little car. It is so reliable. I have had the car for five years and I have not had anything major go wrong in that time. There have been days when my car was outside in -50F weather and it still started in the morning (no block heater)! Very reliable.

It doesn't have real great pick-up power (especially on hills), but overall it was a good value.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 15th April, 2004

1992 Toyota Tercel DX 1.5

Summary:

Forget the Lexus and go buy 25 used Tercels!

Faults:

Burns about 1qt oil every 1000 miles.

Valve job at 100,000 miles, due to neglect by previous owner.

Vinyl seats, front and rear, are torn and require seat covers.

Tough to shift when cold.

General Comments:

This car is an absolute champ! Since I have to add a quart of oil every 1000 miles or so, there is never a need to change the oil. Tires are $20 each and last 40,000 miles. Fuel costs are negligible. Oil, tires, and fuel--that pretty much covers it, because nothing on this car ever breaks, no matter how hard I abuse it. Sure, it's tough to carry on a conversation at freeway speeds, it's like driving a sleigh when the roads are wet, and ascending steep mountain passes may require considerable patience. But if you value bulletproof reliability bordering on indestructibility, ridiculously minimal operating costs, and the feeling of freedom that comes from leaving your car parked in the bad part of town all day long with the windows down and the doors unlocked, knowing that it will still be there when you return, this is your car!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th January, 2004