1990 Volvo 740 GL Wagon 4 cylinder non turbo
Summary:
Best money ever spent on a used car
Faults:
Horn started tooting when turning corners.
Timing belt.
ABS coil steering wheel spring opened.
Pinion seal leak.
Alternator brushes wore out.
Fuel pump quit.
Head liner blew out window.
General Comments:
Easy to maintain, and required parts when needed are inexpensive and available. No comparison to the reliability of my Olds 98. The 740, when loaned out to my sons, always returned ready for the next mission.
The metal brake lines never rusted when exposed to Rochester NY weather.
The engine will keep running long after the headliner blows away in your face, the leather seats crack and expose the underlayment, and the interior plastic door parts snap in your hand.
The alternator brushes wore out and were easily replaced using a Phillips screw driver - without removing the alternator. Probably can't easily replace alternator brushes on today's models.
As a bonus, when the timing belt broke, the engine did not self destruct, even after repeated attempts to restart the engine. And the fuses are hidden just behind the ashtray, unlike the Olds 98 where you had to bang your head under the dash to gain access.
I don't know if today's vehicles will wear as well as this 740.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 19th September, 2018
27th Dec 2012, 00:24
The cost of running a 740 varies with the mechanic. I find it cheap to run, but am amazed at what some people have to pay for repairs.
The Volvo car club could direct you to a reliable mechanic, and club knowledge is great.
I am about to sell my 740 turbo, which is good for years to come.
I have done 110000 miles and had few expenses.
I was about to do a 6000 km plus trip when I decided on a V70 turbo 2.5 2004, so my 740 is up to the task with everything working well, and as new or better. I need a wagon to sleep in when my heart gives me issues, or else I would have kept the 1990 740 turbo sedan.