1989 Peugeot 309 1.9

Summary:

God to drive, expensive parts, feels cheap.

Faults:

Both drive-shafts had to be replased. The driver seat fastening to the floor broke off!

The engine use a lot of oil and water.

Electronic problems, the brake light works... sometimes.

The gear shift handle "broke off". One screw fell off, and the handle got twisted, and a spring fell out. It still works, but not as well as it should. I should have replaced the screw..

The glove compartment broke, and some plastic on the side of the seat.

And the door lock on the drivers side.

And the ignition broke, so I had to permanently short wire the thing with a switch and a start button, because the original part was too expensive.

General Comments:

The car is good to drive.

The engine gives enough power.

I love the automatic transmission. The first car I've owned with an automatic transmission.

It is no rust on the car. Very good.

Now to the bad parts..

It is very difficult to get parts from other suppliers than Peugeot. Some of the Peugeot parts are 6-7 times more expensive then other supplyers in Norway.

Having only two doors is NOT practical, and makes in more difficult to get a child seat inn and out. The seat on the driver side broke off the floor! I have never seen anything like this ever!

It is very little room around the engine, so it's not a car that it is easy to service on your own.

I am used to drive a Volvo 360GL, that was very easy to change parts on, and it was very easy to get cheap spear parts from other suppliers. I scrapped the Volvo after 860 000km, because of rust. The overall quality feeling seemed to be better then the Peugeot. The Peugeot seems like a cheaper car. I don't know if it is, because the high taxes in Norway depends on weight and engine size. This can make a cheap car expensive if it is heavy and has a big engine. The instruments seems cheap, and the seats and generally all the interior. Get a very massive plastic feeling about it.

The glove compartment broke, and also some plastic on the side of the seat. The car has no side protection in the doors. Found that out, because someone backed up in my car. I have to change some parts that usually cost about 180$ (not original), and Peugeot wants 1200$ for them...

Next time I'm going to buy a car, I'll check how easy it is to find cheap parts. I used to live in Mallorca, were cars are dirt cheap - compared to Norway. For what we pay for a new car in Norway, I could buy two cars in Mallorca (and in some cases three).

As a student it's important for me with cheap parts, and a car that I can maintain myself (or even better a car that works like a Toyota).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 4th May, 2005

1989 Peugeot 309 XR 1.6 petrol 98 Octane

Summary:

Cheap and reliable

Faults:

Water-leak in the boot area, having trouble locating it. Totally ruined the back seats.

Also having problems with condensation in the petrol when weather changes from cold to warm.

Rear-window wiper stopped working, hard to access.

General Comments:

The car is reliable never had problems starting even in -15`c.

Not very nice looking interior.

Would recommend a 4 door version, my 2 door is very unpractical.

Used parts is almost given away.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 26th March, 2003

10th Aug 2003, 12:36

The leak in the boot is more than likely coming from around the rear window as they had a tendency to rot there. Peugeot did once do a fixing kit so might be worth asking them, all the best and hope this helps other people lee.