1997 Citroen Xantia 1.6i
Summary:
A dream to drive. A nightmare to own
Faults:
The suspension spheres went shortly after I bought the car. They're expensive (even the aftermarket ones) when compared to standard shock absorbers (despite Citroen fans trying to convince you otherwise...).
* the clutch was gone when I got it and (without me knowing it) so was the power steering hydraulics. Got a clutch kit for 80€ and a used power-steering set for 50€. Labour costs to have these installed however, were a different story...
* LHM system had several leaks. It cost a fortune in labour to get them fixed but shortly after, leaks appeared again.
* Heating seemed to have a life of its own. It didn't start when I'd try to switch it on... and it sometimes out of the blue it did. :-)
* Fuel gauge was totally unreliable. Either gave 1/4 or 1/8 of fuel left. Needless to say I got stuck with no fuel a couple of times.
* The car would 'choke' at low revs and it was often a pain to get it started once the engine got warm. It got new spark plugs, lead cables and injectors cleaned up. Got better but not fine...
General Comments:
The Xantia is a very spacious and comfortable car to drive. The driving position, the seats and the overall driving experience are brilliant! Mine had leather seats which gave the interior a really great look.
However, the car is flawed in many ways because of its poor build quality. Clutch, power-steering, LHM system, spheres, heating, etc. all went soon after I bought it, not to mention a wide number of smaller issues with the car.
It's fair to say, the previous owner didn't look after it as he should have, but the feeling I got was that Citroen did not invest enough time and money testing components and materials through and tried to cut corners here and there.
Maintenance is difficult and therefore only Citroen-experienced mechanics should service them. It goes without saying that it quickly becomes costly to own a Xantia.
The 1.6i engine, with its 88HP, is way short for a car this big and heavy and fuel consumption is too high. I often got 10, 11lts/100km driving in the city, which is a lot for a car this underpowered.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 16th October, 2017
23rd Nov 2019, 15:20
I agree with your comments about the engine. All 1.6 petrol units in most cars in this class (mid - large sized family saloons/hatches) from this time period (1990s) were poor in performance and economy. I believe the only reason the smaller engine was offered was because of cheaper tax rates in some countries for business users.
If buying a car like this again, I would recommend anyone to go for the 1.8 or 2.0 petrol's - much better performance and yet the fuel consumption seems slightly better as well - all my Citroen Xantia's, Renault Laguna's, Vauxhall Vectra's, and Ford Mondeo's did high 30s or even 40 MPG on a long run. You could go for a diesel, but this was when diesel cars were still slow and not great to drive; they were only just starting to get better. If consumption is not an issue however, try a petrol 3.0 V6 in any of these cars ;)