2004 BMW 3 Series 1.6 ti petrol
Summary:
Expensive and barely worth it.
Faults:
Rear spring broke after 14000 miles at cost of £200.
The agent blamed English roads. I told them I handle the car with kid gloves, I am usually the only person in the car and it has never carried any heavy cargo. I said they'd been making cars for English roads long enough to design a decent spring. On a previous BMW compact both of the door locks went at about 30000 miles at a total cost of more than £200 including a bit of BMW "goodwill".
General Comments:
The car is sluggish (I was reluctant to pay another £1500 for the faster version having already paid £20000+)
I was once overtaken by someone on a Vesper scooter who now, I imagine, thinks a lot more of his scooter than I do about my BMW. Although designated a 1.6 the engine is actually a 1.8.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 4th November, 2008
9th Jul 2009, 13:46
Yeah I heard those 1.8 engines are sluggish. What kind of gas mileage you get out of that thing.
I think that 2004 is still the e46 and like the e36, as research and many sources say, still have not fixed the premature breaking of the rear spring. That is a pretty penny to fix, but thought it was usually more than that to fix.
6th Nov 2008, 11:07
When you change it, go back to Volvo and buy the C30. This car is a hundred times a car than the BMW! Looks good, goes well and safe, A great combination - comfortable, too!