2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser Touring 2.0 petrol
Summary:
It doesn't look like any other car
Faults:
The car was 'keyed' during the second week I had it entailing a re-spray of the whole passenger side door.
This is hardly the fault of the manufacturer, and the car has been completely reliable.
General Comments:
In comparison to my previous car (Honda Accord, 2.0 automatic) the Cruiser feels slow to accelerate, but at motorway speeds (!!) it does exactly what it says on the tin - cruises.
Ideally, it needs a bigger engine.
It has the turning circle of an ocean liner.
Rear visibility is poor.
However, I didn't buy it expecting a performance car - it's a head turner, and I bought it because of the way it looks (which I accept some people hate)
It accommodates our family of five (including 3 car seats in the rear for children ranging from 6 months to four years) although the boot could be bigger.
It has a good spec - air con, 6-speaker stereo including CD player, electric windows front and rear, traction control, ABS etc etc.
The Cruiser also has a comfortable driving position and plenty of rear leg room (according to adult friends rather than our 3 children)
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 11th January, 2002
27th Oct 2001, 11:55
You are right, ugly, tacky and cheap looking. I hate the buggers!