2004 Citroen C2 VTS 1.6
Summary:
Overrated!
Faults:
I have had no faults as of yet. So pretty pleased with reliability so far.
General Comments:
The car is quick hits 60 in low 8 sec. But doesn't have the acceleration to 60mph/100mph as my previous car Punto hgt. Hgt was FAR faster, it was in group insurance 14/15 and a 1.8 16v.
Other than that it is a pleasant drive and quite easily sees off plenty of cars.
Not as many gadgets as my old hgt also. Miss my HGT.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 25th October, 2004
5th Apr 2005, 15:50
I have tried both: HGT and C2VTS. Both of them represent the new generation of street racers. HGT replaces the Punto GT and C2vts the Saxo vts. Now I think what you are trying to say is that C2VTS lacks the "Italian race feeling" of HGT, but it is not slower than the HGT. You must try C2 after 15,000 km where the engine shows what it can do. HGT it has more space, but it is not as good as the C2vts in handling. C2vts is made to go fast into the corner and get out even faster. Also the feeling you get from the steering wheel is amazing: as driving a kart. Good value for money, but probably it needs 5bhp more...
9th Nov 2004, 13:18
Well, yes, okay, but your issues with the car are basic traits rather than faults.
If the car isn't fast enough or had an interior you couldn't get on with then why did you buy it?