1988 Ford Escort L 1.3 OHV

Summary:

Great first car experience!!

Faults:

Nothing has actually gone wrong with the car since my ownership. The gearbox seals (small leak) and front shock absorbers had to be replaced (leak) after a month (the car had been stood in dry storage for 3 years before I started using it!).

Been using the car for 2 years now, and clocked up 26,000 with no problems!!

Has been well maintained all its life, and I've continued to look after the car with good oil (5w30w PS), plugs, filters etc...

The Escort also has NO RUST!!... It has never been taken out in the rain since I acquired it, I've continued to wash and wax the car on a regular basis, and the paintwork still looks stunning and no rust has appeared!

General Comments:

This is my first car, and it's been a great experience, very fun to drive even for such a small engine. I'm glad I've experienced a semi old car, as I feel it's made me a better driver for the future (I got the car at 18).

I don't plan to sell it any time soon; with only 45,800 miles on the 1.3 OHV engine, the car runs very smoothly and returns great MPG.

Top speed: 100MPH!! (Scary)

To see a video of my car on Youtube, check out this link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSZkmKpye3c

I can highly recommend a Ford Escort Mk4. Find one that's been well looked after, and continue to maintain it!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 27th January, 2011

7th Sep 2022, 14:25

Looks in great shape for the age and mileage.

1988 Ford Escort LX 1.4 1.4

Summary:

Automotive grey porridge

Faults:

Bought this in a hurry after my Golf MkII was written off by a drunk driver. A mistake.

Had a catalogue of failures from major ones like a core plug on the engine corroding through at 2.5 years old through to losing wheel hub caps whenever it went over a bump.

Dealer service expensive and the 1.4CVH (Constant Vibration & Harshness) engine needed a new cambelt every 22500 miles.

Rubbing strips peeled off door, rust spots appeared under bonnet etc.

General Comments:

The CVH engine was supposed to be "lean burn" but it could not do more than 42mpg on a good day and mostly hovered around 40 even driving gently on the motorway.

Engine was very harsh, especially under acceleration and not very quiet.

Interior plastics wore badly and rapidly developed lots of scratches.

Handling was OK, but the car needed constant adjustment of the steering wheel to keep on track. Also unstable in side winds and easily pushed off line. Not a very relaxing car to drive.

On the plus side, it was reasonably fast in a straight line, but that's the only good point I can think of.

Car had no personality and I was glad to get rid of it after 18 months as soon as I could afford something better.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 26th March, 2006

8th Apr 2006, 11:38

I cannot believe you are complaining about 40-42 mpg in day to day use. That's not far off diesel territory!! I think you'd struggle to find a similarly sized petrol car today that could get near it.

Don't get me wrong, the 1.4 CVH (liked your acronym by the way) is a gutless dog of an engine, and the Escort is hardly the stuff of fantasy, but buying a car you clearly don't like and the complaining endlessly about it on a website seems a bit pointless. You should have bought another Golf if that's what floats your boat. Personally, I find the lower spec Golfs about as interesting as collecting train numbers, but each to their own.

28th Feb 2007, 09:27

Why do you talk about the car having no personality? It's a Ford FFS. Each car has it's own.

28th Feb 2007, 11:55

Cambelt changes are required on this engine every 36k, not 22.5k. It sounds like you ought to try another garage when it comes to servicing.