1997 Ford Fiesta Encore 1.3
Summary:
I would not buy another because of the terrible fuel consumption
Faults:
Rusty wheel arches.
Broken road spring.
Rear wheel cylinders.
Brake pipes and hoses.
All replaced and repaired by myself, and I considered each of these a wear and tear item due to age.
General Comments:
I liked it. It was old when I bought it, and I ran it for 2yrs.
The interior was in incredible condition, and was still good when I got rid of it.
Insurance wasn't bad, performance and comfort were acceptable, but did find that tyre brands made a phenomenal difference to road noise.
Handling was superb, never any problems wet or dry.
My only complaint was the fuel consumption. The best I ever achieved on a run was 49mpg, and the norm was around 40mpg. This was all longish distances, minimum journey time an hour, and all on major roads, not exceeding 60mph. I considered this a nonsense for the size of the engine, and the way I drove. (It was the 60bhp variant, although my friend's 50bhp variant was exactly the same.)
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 29th June, 2009
1st Mar 2015, 21:34
Jeez fella - sorry, but in my opinion, for a car of the age/type/mileage, I think that MPG figure is perfectly acceptable, if not better than that really. Not sure what you are expecting, but if you look around the posts in the Fiesta threads of a similar year and type, I reckon you are bang on the money there.
2nd Jul 2009, 05:55
I am not being funny, but what do you expect on an engine where it dates back to the 1960's, the basics of it. I would have said 49 mpg as the best is good. If you want good fuel consumption, then buy a more modern engine. Even an average of 40 mpg isn't bad even today's standards.