2000 Ford Focus Zetec Estate 1.8

Summary:

Total, unreliable crap

Faults:

You name it it's had it! The clutch barrel went in the car in the first frost of winter, so that had to be replaced entirely - cost £275. Full service and MOT - £150. Accident repairs £475. 3 new tyres £200. Electronic engine management system thingy failed - £500.

General Comments:

The above is excluding the tax and insurance on a car over an 18 mth period. I loathe it with an absolute passion and actually considered an 'insurance job' on it at one point.

I've finally managed to offload it (all being well) and it's started to play up again - on a serious level. I'm just praying it keeps going 'til I'm driving off down the road in another car...

It may be comfy and sit at 90 when it's actually running, but on the whole, this car has frequent engine failure and the cost and reliability far outweigh any negligible benefits such as the heated windscreen, air conditioning etc etc.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 20th March, 2005

21st Mar 2005, 06:06

My 2000 model Focus went back to the lease company having covered 105,000 miles in just under 3 years. One fault (squeaking auxiliary belt tensioner), no breakdowns and still drove superbly. Had routine servicing only, and was driven hard. A far better built and more reliable proposition than the mk4 Golf I had before it.

Countless surveys back my experiences up as well. I suspect you were very unlucky or abused/neglected the car.

2000 Ford Focus Zetec estate 1.8 16v petrol

Summary:

Practical, reliable and good to drive

Faults:

Rear wheel bearing at 105,000 miles.

Other than that, consumables only.

General Comments:

Despite all this "new edge" stuff, and handling that belongs in the 21st century, the Focus is still an old school Ford workhorse. Namely tough, reliable, cheap to service and fix, and good to drive.

Used for carrying a mad border collie from A to B, lugging junk to the tip etc etc so the load area is a bit tatty and chewed, but the rest of the interior still cleans up pretty much like new. Everything still works, and the car drives beautifully.

Bad points are uncomfortable front seats, poor tank range (usually less than 300 miles) and hopeless dealers. The good thing is, most small independent garages won't hesitate to work on a Focus, and parts are cheap. I have it serviced every 10k as per the manufacturer's recommendations and she just keeps going. Out of curiosity I had the garage do compression and oil pressure tests at the last service and both are comfortably within spec.

Solid, well made and reliable all rounder that's pin sharp to drive.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th July, 2004

2000 Ford Focus CL 1.8 turbo diesel

Summary:

Economical Fast Diesel

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

A Truly Amazingly Reliable car, that is very Economical and has a good turn of speed. Handling is really good and comfort excellent. Optional Air Conditioning pack well worth the money.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 23rd June, 2004

2000 Ford Focus Ghia 1.8 litre

Summary:

An excellent small family saloon - marred only by poor front seats

Faults:

Apart from squealing front brakes - nothing!

General Comments:

We bought the Focus 1.8 litre Ghia as a saloon model - not the best looking car, but equipped with a massive boot that swallowed loads of luggage.

We covered 75,000 miles in 3 years all over the UK and the car did not let us down once - no repairs were necessary and all that needed doing was done at the service intervals. The car had two sets of front tyres and one set of rear tyres during its time with us and that was all!

However, the front seats are very uncomfortable and during a long journey you would either get a sore back, a sore hip or a dead leg depending on how you sat.

If Ford did something about the seats (they may have already) it would have been a first rate car.

It would average around 35mpg during London stop/start traffic and could also do nearly 45mpg on motorway runs - not bad from a 1.8 litre car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th October, 2003

13th Jul 2004, 16:56

No they still haven't fixed the seats. I have a facelift (52 registered) model and I suffer from pins and needles in my thighs and hip, a "dead" left leg, and sore back after around 100 miles. And I'm a fit, healthy 28 year old!

Seems odd that the rest of the car is clearly so well thought out and the actual driving position superb, but the seats themselves are appalling. The 1994 Peugeot 306 I was running about in before this was a massively more comfortable long distance car.

22nd Dec 2005, 06:11

Regarding the seats, I thought it was just me who found them as comfortable as sitting on an old milk crate, they really are terrible. The seats in my old Escort in comparison were fantastic, may be I should have kept them. :)