2006 Ford Focus LX TDCi 1.6 TDCI 110 (Euro III)

Summary:

A five-star sequel to a ground-breaking original

Faults:

Nothing as yet, touch wood.

General Comments:

I had a mk1 Focus 1.6 petrol, and when it came to replacing it, I looked at all the £9,000 options - a Clio III dCi, a 207 petrol, an Astra petrol and a Citroen C4 HDi. All were a maximum of a year old, none new.

The C4 was good-looking, but I couldn't get used to all the displays, and the gearchange was long, and notchy. Despite having the same engine as this Focus it's performance felt slower due to the vastly inferior gearchange.

Outside, it's not particularly striking, but in the colour I have (Jeans blue) it does look classy and solid. The colour is also no longer produced, meaning it won't become as common as my silver Focus did.

Inside the Focus is conventional, and this, for me, was an advantage. Plastics are a bit cheap looking on the lower areas, but the most annoying gripe about the interior is the handbrake/cupholder area. Bottles get in the way of changing gear, and the handbrake is on the passenger side and not within comfortable reach. The Clio had the best driving position of all cars, and the classiest interior.

What Clio doesn't have is space: the Focus has it in spades, everywhere. Nearly as big as the Mondeo in the back and the boot isn't small. LX isn't as well equipped as most, but it has the basics and the seats are a vast improvement over the old one. Though I note the omission of alloys and the heated front screen I had on my previous Focus LX. The radio is an improvement, however.

So why do I rate the car so highly? You can't underestimate the drive. The gearchange is an improvement on the old Focus, as is the ride. It handles with less roll, and although they've not cured the road noise (read roar on old concrete m-ways) they have sealed out wind noise, and most of the diesel engine noise, especially at motorway speeds. But make no mistake, the engine is a revelation. It's a Peugeot-Citroen unit, and I've never driven (Mondeo TDCi included) such a refined, and driveable (revvy, powerful and economical) engine. The Mondeo is that bit noiser in my opinion and less economical, but only similarly performing. IT's also well-geared in the Focus.

The Clio was similar in all the above respects, regarding it's drive, though it rolled more noticeably, it's let down by steering which neglects to tell you what the front tyres are doing, and it's here the Focus capitalised. It's steering is second-to-none, as for a diesel hatchback, I couldn't find any better all-rounder.

Think of it as Star Wars, the first was flashy, and magnificent, and the second though not as ground-breaking, moved everything on that bit more.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 15th April, 2007

10th Aug 2009, 02:59

My Golf Mk 5 has the handbrake set for LHD cars too. A real inconvenience especially in city traffic where you're forever apologising to your passenger for nudging them when applying the handbrake. Why can't manufacturers just put the handbrake in the centre if they're going to sell their cars in RHD markets?

2006 Ford Focus 1.6

Summary:

Value for money!

Faults:

Nothing, but I've only had it for a month. But I expects it to be rather fault free. The Focus has one of the highest reliability ratings in the compact segment, only just beaten by cars like the Corolla (too dull). I would be disappointed if something major happens.

General Comments:

Quiet, rattle free, tight, well built, stylish, well equipped; summing it up. I'm surprised to see how much value for money this Focus MkII is. Not the cheapest in the market, but if you line up the features along with the price you'll see there are few models that matches the new Focus. It has better or similar build quality as the "prestige marques". The handling is also better than any rival which also most professional reviewers point out. Only thing that I've noted is that the 1.6 is a little bit too weak for this car, should be a 2.0 since it is an automatic. Affects mid-range performance like when overtaking, but OK for city and motorway driving.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 14th December, 2006

17th Dec 2006, 11:32

My 1.6 is noisy under acceleration, but when not stressed I agree that this car is quiet. The difference is very noticeable since there is little road and wind noise on my car. Also read about this in a review, but did not pay much attention to this. But this is basically my only concern. Otherwise a good car. Ford did a good job on this one.

20th Jan 2007, 12:49

Yes, the focus is a great drive, very pointy into corners and a good ride. I do agree that the 1.6 has very little accelleration wise, so don't expect explosive performance. The other thing to mention on my vehicle (1.6 auto) is the low fuel economy which is about 30mpg in the real world. I had to expect it really, but had to have an automatic as I can't drive a manual car. Otherwise, I love it, excellent build quality (as good as a VW golf now) and would totally recommend it. If you want one, try a 2.0 Litre or TDCi First!

29th Jan 2007, 00:38

Anyone, what are your real world mpg's for the 1.6 aut? Ford's official figures are very optimistic to say it mildly and I've never been able to reach any of the stated figures, neither for motorway or combined driving. I assume the test drivers are using eggs under their feet.

My average is about 32 mpg. The car is used to/from work, 10 miles each way and some longer trips in the weekend, motorway at 60-70. Coming from a larger car one motive was smaller petrol bills, but this engine is thirstier than I expected and I thought actual figures should be closer to the official ones. Probably need to buy the diesel the next time?