2005 Ford Mondeo Ghia X 2.0 TDCi

Summary:

Still going

Faults:

The 2.0 TDCi has many known issues from this time period. My car has eaten two turbos, an EGR valve, and now has an oil leak.

The rest has just been wear and tear expected of the age and miles.

General Comments:

20 year old Mondeo still going strong. The reason I keep it is that it is still nice to drive, economical (diesel) and cheap to fix.

Yours truly knows a local Ford expert to keep this thing running. Otherwise, most people scrapped them whenever they had common issues that were too dear to fix.

But this Mondeo I feel is a little underrated - it can be a reliable car if you get it sorted.

The fact mine is still going at this age says it all, though I do admit I have spent quite a bit to keep it gong. Rust is normally an issue as well for these cars now, but mine has been garaged since I got it and has never had any problems at MOT time.

Ghia X has it all, and apart from the air con being dead, all electrics still work!

Interior is still comfortable and fresh. Love the exterior looks too.

For Ford fans only at this age, but worth it if you get a good one.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 7th March, 2025

15th Mar 2025, 14:56

Turbo is very common failure on the TDCi from this time period. Friend had the 2.2 TDCi and went through three turbos in its lifetime. But he did take it to 200,000 miles as a taxi.

Bloody fast and economical when it was working though, shame the reliability of diesels from time is not better. Modern ones (even though they are more complicated) are actually a bit better reliability wise. Currently running a 1.5 TDCi 2015 Mondeo at 120,000 miles no major problems. Give them a firm drive and a proper quality frequent oil change and they seem to be OK.

2005 Ford Mondeo LX 1.8 petrol

Summary:

MK2 Mondeo was better

Faults:

Lots. Engine misfire, clutch, exhaust, oil and coolant leaks, rust, the list goes on.

General Comments:

This MK3 Mondeo is when the Mondeo took a turn for the worse in my opinion. After many reliable MK1's and MK2's in the family, when I bought this MK3 back in 2011 I thought it would be business as usual, but the car was not great.

Good to drive, but the 1.8 petrol engine barely did 35 mpg, and performance was not great. More reliable than the diesels however.

Not bad to look at. Exterior wise anyway. The interior is just weird looking however, and too much plastic everywhere! LX model was mid range with enough equipment. Very comfortable though.

An average car, just should have been better. Later MK4 Mondeo was better.

I scrapped this one back in 2019 just before all the covid nonsense, was glad to see the back of it.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 7th January, 2024

12th Jan 2024, 16:51

It must have been good enough to keep for 8 years?

Anyways, the MK1 and MK2 were better because they were simpler. The MK3 came at a time when people wanted more. That meant more complex electronics. Mechanically, yours also had a Dual Mass Flywheel (yes, even on petrol's at this time, not just diesel).

The MK4 Mondeo is as problematic as any at higher mileage, but it is a better car overall than the MK3 was, I agree with you there.

2005 Ford Mondeo Zetec 2.0 TDCi

Summary:

Awful diesel, get a petrol Mondeo!

Faults:

Turbo and injectors caused the biggest headache and were very expensive to fix.

The rest was just wear and tear as with any car; I serviced the car on time and drove carefully, and normally did longer drives not short journeys.

General Comments:

When it was working correctly the car performed great and did a solid 45 - 50 mpg.

Good looking car fun to drive. So good in-fact it is hard to believe it would be nearly twenty years old now, and could give modern cars a run for their money in the handling department. Stunning in dark blue with alloy wheels. Seats were very comfortable.

Would never get diesel again though - my friend had a 2003 1.8 petrol LX model that went for over 100,000 with no major issues, whereas my car was barely six years old when I got rid of it with low mileage!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 14th February, 2023