1995 Ford Probe 2.0 16v petrol
Summary:
A sheep in wolf's clothing which wants to scare the other sheep
Faults:
Not much, immobiliser problem was the biggy. Also metal for one of the wings has degraded faster than it should have.
General Comments:
Nice car, looks gorgeous but the 2.0L is underpowered for the size and bulk of the car.
Handling is fantastic, it just seems to stick to the road.
Underestimated car which hasn't been given a fair go in the UK. Ford should have brought out a mk2 which addressed the niggling little problems.
Obviously 2.0L is cheaper to run than 2.5L but don't expect the running costs to be cheap.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 26th August, 2000
2nd Jun 2001, 15:10
The Probe is marred by niggling problems but it still turns heads more than the Calibra which is now virtually ignored. I reckon its because of the superior Probe body styling. The lines are smooth and curved and from the A pillars to the front flip up headlights looks very similar to the Ferrari 456GT coupe. Also the Calibra is an attractive body but slung over the old Cavalier chassis and interior and many publicised road tests said the ordinary 8V 2.0i had better road handling than all the other faster versions where the old Cavalier chassis just could not handle the power - at least the Probe was a new creation from the ground up.
The Probe's wrap round rear screen and lights and curvy interior has bought it BACK into fashion - I think people are fed up of seeing slab sided ugly chunky designs like a lot of new cars are now - curves is best - ask Ferrari, Porsche, Lambourghini, Jaguar - they obviously think so. Incidently the odd looking angular Cougar isn't as good looking as the Probe either.
Nigel, email: mail@nhillyard.freeserve.co.uk.
22nd Feb 2001, 09:15
Go for a Calibra! A number of people I know who have had experience of both, would go for the Calibra every time. Read my review of a 1997 SE8.