1989 Honda Accord EXi 2.0

Summary:

Reliable, built to last, and rare!!!

Faults:

Since owning this car, I can honestly say that nothing major has faulted with the car, only had to replace two front tyres and brake pads (common stuff anyhow!)

On the drivers electric window, although it still operates, some of the rubber guide in the bottom of the door has come away, so I have to 'encourage' and push the top of the window down with a bit of pressure, so it goes up straight instead of a slight angle!!

General Comments:

This car is my second of this particular model and same body shape; the only difference is the transmission (previous was an automatic, this one is a manual).

Cruise control is excellent, air conditioning still works and is ice cold!!!

The stereo is original and the tape has packed in, although the radio still works fine.

These cars are built like tanks; I had a job to find another one the same shape, as most have disappeared to scrap yards or stock car races!!! The engines run and run and run!!

Electrics are usually fine.

Typical rust spots are the rear bottom wheel arches and odd spots round the rear light clusters (it gets really mucky here in winter!!) These cars still look good, 16 years on!!!

I was involved in an accident in my first Accord, and out of 5 cars, mine was the only car that drove home!!! This was part of the reason why I bought another, as I felt SAFE inside!!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 21st July, 2007

1989 Honda Accord 2.0 petrol

Summary:

I must have done something pretty bad in a previous life

Faults:

Just about everything.

Major electrical faults in interior (one circuit always blew a fuse the moment you turned the ignition on)

Radio wiring was a nightmare (cavity was damaged, possibly from a previous theft)

Engine misfired, smoked and burnt oil even though I changed the oil twice. Reasonably powerful though.

Gearbox best described as "wobbly" - it felt as if would collapse if you accelerated hard.

Water leaks & oil leaks everywhere.

Timing belt snapped, destroying the engine.

At this point I got the council to take it away and bury it in an unmarked grave.

Dealer's can't get parts anymore and treat you like dirt. Not sure they would have worked on it even if they'd been asked to.

General Comments:

My ex-wife bought this after the Laguna was repossessed. Apparently it was a part-ex at the Renault garage. She never did let on what she paid for it.

Anyway, this was before the divorce and the car was the only thing the lawyers let me keep.

The Renault was not good, but the Honda was a thousand times worse. I think I might have tried to patch it up, but getting parts is very difficult and the dealer's don't want to know about - well, anything. I think their only remit is to flog new Hondas.

I bought an Escort Estate last week at auction and it's so much better. All the parts are obtainable from the local Ford dealer and the parts staff a really helpful.

Two morals to this story:

- Don't get married

- Don't buy a Honda.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 28th August, 2005

28th Aug 2005, 10:25

You must have bought a duffer - Hondas from around the eighties/early nineties are very well-made, reliable cars, and you can hardly blame the timing belt snapping on the car.

1st Sep 2005, 16:51

My ex-wife bought it, not me.

I can't see how you can possibly keep one of these things on the road because it seems almost impossible to get spare parts for any model year. If I'd been able to fix it up I might have thought more of it.

The Escort has 165k and did need some work doing to it, but two visits to the Ford dealer and one to the local motot factors got me everything I needed.

18th Oct 2006, 16:02

Original reviewer:

Unfortunately some low life STOLE my Escort a few weeks ago, took it out into the country, ragged it until the engine expired and then burnt it.

I've had a few conversations with people about Honda cars since buying the Escort, particularly as regards getting spares. So I decided to take the plunge and go back to the auction where I bought the Escort to look for a second Accord. I bought a 1997 model with 129000 miles. Touch wood, it's pretty good so far...

1989 Honda Accord Aerodeck EXi 2.0 injection

Summary:

Reliable, cheap, distinctive, comfortable and rapid transport

Faults:

Drive shafts needed replacing at 95000 miles (cost £150 per side).

Anti-lock braking system failed at 90000 miles (although this did not impair normal braking performance).

General Comments:

The Aero-deck is a great looking and distinctive car, a modern day Scimitar GTE.

The car is comfortable and has an impressive standard specification (including cruise control).

Performance is swift and effortless, although the car has a tendency to understeer heavily in the wet and wheel spins very easily out of junctions.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 19th August, 2001

10th Dec 2001, 04:42

I totally agree with the reviewer and find the 1989 Honda Accord Aerodeck to be a good well put together, capable car, and the only problems I've had are parts prices/lack of dealer help, lack of traction in the wet and in some cases, excess power.

1989 Honda Accord EX 2.0 petrol

Faults:

Nothing in 5 years and 40000 miles.

General Comments:

Refined ride and handling. Reasonably quiet. Very reliable.

Steering and brakes may be too light for some drivers.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th August, 1997