1995 Honda Accord 2.0i ES Auto 2.0 injection

Summary:

I'd consider another Honda only if it is low mileage

Faults:

I bought this second hand for £2000 and the air-con never worked. I had it gassed, it was great for 1 day, but the next day it was blowing hot air again. So a leak somewhere.

Biggest gripe is that car drank like a fish. I estimate it did about 18 miles/gallon. 65 litres did about 250 miles tops.

There was significant rust on the rear wheel arches. The rear bumper came off on one side due to this rust. I never got it repaired because it wasn't worth it.

At about 1,10,000 miles, drivers side window got stuck. Had it repaired on two separate occasions since and it meant driving with the window open. It also meant I couldn't wind it all the way down in case it got stuck again. Cost about £100 to fix each time using RAC windscreens.

At about 1,20,000 miles the car developed a hot starting problem. The car refused to re-start if I drove to a petrol pump for example - had to wait from a few minutes to half an hour before it would start again. Took it to a Honda dealer in Dunstable (Bedfordshire) who after "investigating" said they were unable to locate the problem, but happily quoted me £1800 for other things that they felt I should get done! After prowling the internet, I found the fault to be the main relay which I re-soldered myself and it was fixed. Locating the main -relay was another job in itself - there was no manual to go by and the part was extremely hard to get to.

At 1,25,000 miles, the distributor died and at the same time, the radiator began leaking. The rocker cover gasket has also failed, so it leaked oil everywhere. So I got rid of the car.

General Comments:

Handles well. Great on motorways. Mechanics were sound until I had problems already mentioned. I attribute these issues mostly to the high mileage of the car and wear and tear. The dealer I dealt with in Dunstable were a rip off when it came to servicing or repair.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th March, 2006

17th Mar 2006, 12:09

£2000 for an 8yr old Accord is way, way too much. How come you let them charge you £1800 for work you didn't authorise???

20th Feb 2007, 21:11

Why would you buy another piece of junk?

1995 Honda Accord iLS 2.0L 130 bhp 16v SOHC injection

Summary:

Exceptionally cheap, decent quality family car; but be wary of gremlins

Faults:

Mysterious electrical fault causes the car to fail to start on very cold or damp mornings. The local Honda garage confirmed the problem as being the main relay and replaced it - but the car still doesn't start when cold unless the interior of it is heated up by a hairdryer... odd.

Electric window switch pack failed (caught fire, in fact), due to dodgy DIY wiring by one of the previous owners.

Passenger side electric window arms are broken.

Rocker cover gasket is blown.

Driver's side wheel bearing is busted.

General Comments:

This car generally seems to be a step backwards, both in quality and reliability, from the previous-generation (Japanese-built) Accord I owned - it went through 80,000 miles and 3 years without any problems whatsoever until it was irreparably damaged.

There are *some* redeeming features though, namely the decently quick engine which gives the car a fair power-to-weight ratio (100bhp/ton) and 130mph cruising potential (on the Autobahn of course...). Economy is decent too, with around 30mpg even when the car is driven quickly on rural roads. Plus it has the "classic" Honda gearbox - which has to be the best gearbox I've ever used - it's direct and "snickety".

The handling is utterly foolproof, all the car will do is understeer. The steering is very direct, but doesn't give much feel despite the tiddly 185-section tyres. The car takes most things in its stride, except harsher bumps. I've even had all four of its double wishbone-suspended wheels off the ground over "yumps" without complaint... it's hardly an NSX, but it's well handling enough for a family car, and certainly better than the wallowy and indirect E36 BMW 3-series I drove which is supposedly the better driver's car.

The interior is well-built, but not all that roomy, especially with the electric sunroof installed - taller drivers and passengers tend to scrape their heads on the headlining. But so far nothing has broken off, so some credit to the British Honda works where it was built.

The local Honda dealer is pretty poor; they managed to break the backwards-forwards seat adjuster and not fix it. I had to kick up a fuss before they actually did anything about it. Also they changed the spark plugs without changing the obviously worn-out HT leads which proceeded to fail a couple of weeks later resulting in misfiring.

Aesthetically it's looking good for a 9-year old car, with only one rust spot caused by someone failing to repair a scratch earlier in its life. The paintwork is still very lustrous. But I have seen versions of this car and its sister car the Rover 600 that have some extreme rust so maybe mine is just a well-finished one-off...

All in all it's a good car apart from the electrical problems; I think my electric problems may be isolated because I haven't heard anything else negative about the reliability in this era of UK-built Accords - though I did hear from someone who said a batch of Hondas had cold-start problems. It does seem that Hondas had a dip in quality and reliability somewhere in the mid-late '90s.

But you can pick one of these up for as little as £700 (mine was a huge £1200) now and at that price you really can't go wrong.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 25th July, 2004

19th Dec 2022, 15:02

Old but excellent review. I think you definitely got a bit unlucky with this car - I had an Accord from this time period years ago as well, it was an excellent car, and I think the UK build quality standards were up to par with the Japanese at the time.