2008 Honda Civic Type-S 2.2 CDTi turbo diesel

Summary:

Economical, reliable, spacious, spaceship!! :)

Faults:

The bluetooth has stopped connecting with my phone. Going to speak to the dealer on the next service to get this sorted.

Wing mirror got smashed by oncoming car (who wouldn't simply wait to let me pass). Not the manufacturers fault, but costs £300+ to replace the cover, indicator and mirror glass!!!

General Comments:

It is extremely comfortable, relaxing to drive and has plenty of grunt to pull away if in the wrong gear. Motorway cruising is easy, as 70mph seems more like 40mph...

The car is extremely economical. I get over 50mpg if driving Miss Daisy, or lowest is about 45mpg when pushing it...

Looks like a spaceship inside, which always puts a smile on my face!!

Mine is fitted with all the luxuries (i.e. sat nav, bluetooth, bumper protectors etc). All have been an absolute delight!! The bumper protectors have saved me scuffing the bumper, much cheaper to fix. The sat nav is so simple, I use it almost daily!! The bluetooth has gone wrong, but when it's working it is brilliant, and again, very easy to use!!

The handling of the car is extremely good in the dry. It glides over bumps, but really digs in when cornering hard. It slightly loses this feeling when the road is wet, because the car tends to under steer slightly...

All in all, I couldn't be happier!!! I do over 20,000 miles a year, so needed something reliable, economical, but nice to drive also!!!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th April, 2009

18th Jun 2010, 18:09

What! no slipping clutch?

Don't worry, that's still to come, and Honda will not want to know.

19th Jun 2010, 13:55

"What! no slipping clutch?

Don't worry, that's still to come, and Honda will not want to know."

Almost all the problems one could encounter with a clutch in any vehicle are caused by poor driving skill.

19th Mar 2011, 20:13

Sorry, but the clutch slips because it's smaller than needed for this kind of torque engine. I drove a 2.2 for 2 years, fantastic car, sold with 79000 kms, and replaced a faulty clutch, replaced a faulty transmission, and an undersized shattered turbo charger. Thanks God it was still under warranty, and they never understood what happened.

2008 Honda Civic Type R 2.0 i-VTEC

Summary:

Fantastic little ballistic missile

Faults:

Nothing, although too new to comment in the case of my vehicle. A friend owns an identical make, model and trim level but with 12,500 miles on. He has had the grand total of zero problems with his.

General Comments:

Having been on the lookout for quite some time for a second car, and after many months of careful research and trips to the BMW, Ford and Vauxhall forecourts, we found ourselves at the local Honda dealership.

Climbing into the Type R on the test drive, one of the first things that was immediately striking was the interior. It's very funky looking, nicely laid out, and it's clear Honda have put a lot of thought into focusing the experience around the driver, with every control placed exactly and intuitively where you'd expect to find it.

Once driving the Type R it was immediately clear to me that despite lacking the immediate torque I'd been spoilt with in previous cars, the little Honda did something very special. It was more involving to drive.

Climbing behind the wheel of most modern (and usually turbocharged) 200bhp cars, I have found in my experience that they are *too* effortless to drive. My 54 plate Astra Coupe Turbo was blisteringly quick, but required no more involvement than pushing your foot to the floor in order to pick up tremendous speed. You'd find yourself constantly backing off on the throttle as the speed limit came up all to quickly. This is a stark contrast to the Type R. The Type R does require working harder to get the performance, but in my opinion, is all the better for it.

Day to day, drive the Civic Type R gently, and the car behaves like a normal 2.0 litre. Brisk pace is easily achievable without working the engine hard. Bury your foot in the throttle however, and start making use of the VTEC unit, and the driver is rewarded with a growl and raucous engine noise, and raspy exhaust note, as the car quickly picks up pace.

0-60 times for this car are published figures of 6.4 seconds, and I have no reason to disbelieve the figures. Being 200kg lighter than most of it's key rivals means that despite the lack of torque compared to the Astra VXR, Focus ST and Golf GTi, the car is extremely quick off the line.

From a handling perspective, the car will change direction on a postage stamp. The steering is very direct and precise, and the vehicle remains stable while being chucked into corners, giving immediate driver confidence in the car's handling. There is also plenty of feel through the seats, steering and pedals letting you know exactly where the line is at all times. Push the car over it's limits of grip, and the car will gracefully transition into gentle under-steer. The Vehicle Stability Assist has been set up by Honda to allow the driver to have 'more fun' before stepping in, and works very nicely, never feeling intrusive, but ready to correct anything too over zealous.

Issues I have found with the car are few and far between. A couple of criticisms however, include the brakes and the stereo.

The issue with the brakes isn't one of safety per say, but if the driver wished to take the car on a track day or similar, they would want to buy an aftermarket brake upgrade, as when pushed, I found the car suffered badly from brake fade. I'm not an expert on car mechanics, but I suspect grooved and vented discs should have been fitted on this car as standard to help mitigate this issue.

Our other car is a Ford Mondeo ST. The stereo in this vehicle is fantastic, plenty of bass, and very punchy, with a clear well rounded sound even at low volume. Sadly the Civic's stereo lacks the punch or the clarity of Ford's Sony unit. More noticeable perhaps because of the heavy metal that usually blares loudly whilst I'm driving.

In summary, I would definitely recommend the Type R to anyone looking at a performance hot hatch. Most dealerships now fit the Type R with an aftermarket Tracker at no cost to the owner, although not all do. Buy one from a dealer that does and you'll save yourself £400. Insuring the vehicle at age 29 with 7 years no claims, a clean license, and the tracker (in a nice area of town) and parking my car on the driveway at night has brought my insurance in at £470 per year. Not bad for a group 17 insurance vehicle.

If you are lucky enough to have the money in your early 20s to be buying one of these, *do* check the insurance out before buying. I've heard horror stories of £1700-2500 per year to insure.

I hope this review will be useful to anyone looking seriously at owning one of these. Enjoy.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th September, 2008

12th Oct 2008, 13:02

I have had a 2000 Honda Civic V-tec and 98 Civic 1.5, and am a great Honda fan. The Civic Type-R is definitely my new choice. Go Hondaaaa!!!

13th Aug 2009, 05:47

This isn't a very good car first of all...

The lock-to-lock turning circle is very poor on our Australian road.

The car is heavy for a "Type R", which weighs 1345kg.

The car understeers so much when pushing it at corners.

The rear suspension uses a torsion beam setup which is utterly disappointing.

The only good thing about this car is the riding comfort if you're a big fan of the Type-R series; it's still as firm as ever, and most of all the aggressive low-slung frontal looks of the car.

All-in-all I'm very disappointed that we Australians even purchased this vehicle. Honda Australia didn't do a very good job. The EK9 and EP3 Type-R's would've had more fans than this FN2 model.