1992 Jaguar XJ40 Sovereign 4.0
Summary:
Pointless, buy an XJS or BMW 540 instead
Faults:
Heater fan broke - bad connection on relay, fixed
Clock light faulty, PCB fault have not repaired (yet)
Rear screen needed re-bonding
Central locking sometimes intermittent on rear doors.
Update October 2009:
Faulty autogearbox - rough engagement of drive or neutral
Oil leak from head-gasket (declared game over and sold the car!)
General Comments:
Excellent ride and handling, interior is a pleasant place to be, very "gentlemans club". Seating is not as comfortable as you might expect on long journeys. "Leather" interior is only leather facing on the seats, the rest is vinyl.
Performance not as quick as I expected, and is significantly slower off the line than the XJS 3.6 or 4.0. Not the sweetest of 6 pot engines, although this is offset by *very* good sound insulation.
Wind and road noise probably very good for its day, but most modern saloons can match the car in terms of noise, at cruising speeds.
Update October 2009:
It was nothing like as quiet as an XJS or series III, there was a lot of road noise from the rear tyres. However I have since found that worn pendulum bushes on the rear suspension may have been the cause of this.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 19th October, 2007
24th Apr 2008, 12:23
I have an XJ40. I've had it since 2001. It is a 1992 model. It's has never broken down.
I may add I've got it to this day, and it starts on the first turn of the key. It also has over 250000 miles on it, and burns no oil and loses no water.
All the electrics are good, down even to its climate control.
A great car, which is now in my garage as I plan to keep it as a classic.
However, my S Type is a car. I hope it treats me as good as my XJ40.
Bumble.