2009 Mazda 6 TS2 2.2 turbo diesel
Summary:
Rubbish from a sneaky manufacturer, never again
Faults:
Queried first service cost of £330 at 11000 miles, only an oil change? Ur so I thought. Must be gold in the oil!
It would seem that a fault with the injectors, which should be treated as a recall, but isn't, is the reason for the hiked up charge.
Super sneaky Mazda charge the customer for this modification. If you refuse to pay for the modifications, then Mazda will tell you that's the end of their warranty, you are on your own.
This fault in the injector system lets diesel oil run down the cylinders into the sump, which then dilutes the lubrication of the engine oil!!! Hence the normal high and low marks on the dipstick, but wait a higher mark above the high mark is on the dipstick. When your oil level reaches this mark, Mazda says you must have your oil changed. Why, because a third of what is showing on the dip stick is diesel fuel. Therefore resulting in diminished lubrication, and Mazda has the audacity to pass on the cost to the customer, hide it in the first service cost. By the way, at 70,000 miles, they have to be changed again, so another hefty bill to look forward to.
Be warned, you won't be told this when they are all smiles in the showroom, dreaming of getting their hands on you hard earned dosh.
General Comments:
I never thought a Japanese manufacturer would stoop so low. This is my second Mazda, the first was in 1976, I bought a 626 1.8 petrol. It also although petrol was an oil burner, might as well have been a diesel, the amount of engine oil it got through. I had to carry a one gallon can of engine oil in those days to top before the return journey.
I hadn't touched Mazda since 1976 until 2009, and I wish I'd stayed away.
Problem was I and a lot of others thought these were Ford engines and the 6 was a Mondeo under a different skin, as Ford owns a 33% share of Mazda. How wrong I was. I blame Ford too, if they had designed the new Mondeo a decent shape, I would never have bought a Mazda 6 in the first place.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No
Review Date: 20th March, 2010
24th Feb 2023, 23:04
Either way neither manufacturer is to blame. Problem is the diesel engines in general from this time. They all require complicated systems and injectors, which almost always fail at some point after 50K mileage.
I have have had various cars from Ford, Mazda, VW, Audi, Skoda, Volvo, with similar 1.6 or 2.0 turbo diesel engines. The injectors (amongst other things) always failed at some point, and was always expensive to fix.
In more recent years I have went back to petrol engines, so far so good but even these engines are a bit more complicated nowadays, but at least petrol is currently cheaper to buy than diesel and you can now get a good 40 + MPG out of them as well, so I see no reason to buy diesel again! Not interested in electric either.
24th Mar 2010, 16:25
"as Ford owns a 33% share of Mazda"
Nope! According to Wikipedia Ford announced it was selling 20% of Mazda back on November 2008 bringing their share to just 13.4%.