1992 Mercedes-Benz 190 E 2.0 petrol

Summary:

Still the best

Faults:

Services and consumables.

Engine had a very minor oil and coolant leak in my last year of ownership, but not serious, no appreciable loss of any fluids to be barely noticeable.

General Comments:

A classic solid Mercedes I had a long time ago and what a great car it was. Miss it to this day. Dark red "J" registered car.

The 190e was a smaller car from Mercedes, but I found it spacious enough inside, comfortable interior if a bit poorly equipped considering the car's cost (not much electrical equipment). But the seats were OK and the car was quiet and smooth. Controls felt solid.

2.0 petrol with the auto box didn't have great performance or economy, but acceptable for its time.

Sold it in 2002 when it wasn't worth very much, but wish I had held on to it, they are worth a fortune now even in basic specification.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th September, 2023

1992 Mercedes-Benz 190 E 1.8

Summary:

Very good, but also disappointing

Faults:

Nothing wrong, the car's been perfect, no reliability problems.

General Comments:

Very nicely built, reliable, comfortable, good on fuel for the kind of car, but the equipment level is really poor. It's a 1992 K reg Mercedes Benz, and it doesn't have a load of gadgets it should had. Here are some things it doesn't have, but it should have: air conditioning, electric windows, adjustable steering, rear wiper and lots of other kind of basic gadgets that should be included in a £20,000 car.

Even the power steering isn't fully 100% power steering; that is really poor for a Mercedes Benz. Other than that, it's a very good car.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 26th September, 2010

1992 Mercedes-Benz 190 190D 2.5 non-turbo diesel

Summary:

Very reliable and good for alternative fuels, just slower than dial up internet

Faults:

The differential was worn - they all go after about 120,000 miles on these, so I had to get it reconditioned.

The prop shaft & rear sub frame bushes were gone, so it made a noise like driving over a dead body when you changed gear.

There was a oil leak onto the alternator, so that had to be replaced.

The interior fan made a noise like a coffee grinder, and eventually ground its last bean.

One of the glow plugs had failed, so the glow plug light would glow inanely at you after you'd started the car. It would still start on the button in -6 temperatures though.

General Comments:

Being a 92bhp 2.5 five cylinder, you'd think it'd have a bit of poke, but you'd be disappointed. It's definitely faster than any of the W123 Mercs, but it'll have you screaming the slogan from Vauxhall Corsa commercials on motorway inclines ("Come on!").

The fastest mine would go was indicated 115mph, which was probably about 104mph in real life.

Due to its, revolutionary at the time, 5 link rear suspension, it did handle pretty well for a big car. If you popped the clutch halfway around a round-a-bout in 2nd, it would merely gently under steer, which was very safe for such a large rwd car. Just boring. It was a bit boaty around the corners, but the ride quality was good.

The engines on these cars are faultless, aside from the glow plugs they run with out fail. There is an unofficial world record for a W123 Mercedes 240D engine that has done 2,300,000 miles.

An added bonus is that you can run these diesels on various other oils. Peanut oil is the 'optimax' of the alternative fuel world, but I generally ran mine on rapeseed as that is cheapest in this country.

You can also run them on WVO (waste vegetable oil) without doing much other than filter the burnt chips from it.

Fuel economy wasn't great, I found I had to clog it to get anywhere, thus it would return around 27mpg. If you don't mind having a funeral procession of at least 10 cars flashing, beeping and gesturing at you, then I think 40 mpg is possible.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 6th August, 2008