2003 Renault Clio 172 2.0 16v
Summary:
Awesome
Faults:
Nothing!!!
General Comments:
Fantastic car - I cannot fault it and will buy another, it will leave BMWs standing and still return good fuel economy/reliability and fun! what more can you want!
Looks good, cabin is great... I love this car.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 7th October, 2005
24th Oct 2005, 20:11
Quite quick down low revs, poor up high revs. zs180 runs rings around it.
7th Nov 2005, 02:35
ZS 180 is a basically a "SLOW", "CHEAP" looking car, suitable for "OLD" men.
...we know you feel as though you are driving a performance machine when cruising in your zs 180 (rover 45), but in reality your car is nothing more than a maxed powered Rover 45, with average performance due to its fat weight!
10th Oct 2005, 04:21
I want something that doesn't fall apart, and something that the dealers are capable of fixing first time when (on one of the many occasions) it goes wrong. I would also like something from a manufacturer that a) acknowledges that four breakdowns, six build quality issues, and four electrical faults in a four month period on a brand new car (three within the first week!) is unacceptable and b) bothers to return phone calls.
Admittedly mine was an early one, but it was a total disaster. I will never buy another Renault product again. The 172 offers incredible performance for the money, but when you live with one for a year, you soon see where they made the savings.
This car replaced an Alfa Romeo 156 2.0 Twin Spark which was better built and more reliable!