2004 Renault Clio Dynamique 1.6 16v

Summary:

Excellent

Faults:

The car has been superb, no problems so far touch wood. But with a three year manufacturer's warranty, there is nothing to worry about if something did go wrong with the car.

The door badges should be in silver as to distinguish it more from standard models, as the only noticable difference between the engine sizes on the outside is the door badges.

General Comments:

The 1.6 16V Clio is quick, it's very comfortable, its got just about every extra I can think of as standard and it's reliable.

It has:

- Electric windows, mirrors, sunroof

- R.a.i.d. (Renault anti intrusion device)

- Smart window wipers

- Digital petrol temperature gauge

- Trip computer

- Climate control

The car is just a general good round little car to own. I would recommend this model to anyone who wants a sporty little car who wants comfort and quality, and it still manages 36 mpg.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th November, 2004

7th Nov 2004, 12:33

I got my Brand New Clio 1.6 16v October 2004 (3 weeks ownership as of writing this) and I must agree with the comments made from above. As this is my first car from passing my test I can't tell you how good it is.

I got some extras with mine and some of these include:

Xenon Headlights With Auto Adjustment.

Up-Rated Sound System Including 6CD Multi-Changer.

Climate Control.

At the moment I have covered around 200 miles since brand new and had no problems so far.

I' am really happy with the car and the engine is more than enough at 110bhp to meet most peoples needs.

13th Jan 2005, 07:56

I have been reading these comments about the clio, i can quite safely say that after reading some of the comments that this car will be very satisfactory for my needs. I pick my 52 plate 1.4 16v on monday.

29th Jan 2005, 19:34

Reading all comments here its fair to say the Clio is very good value for money. Having bought my 04 plate 1.2 Dynamique 3 weeks ago based on your opinions collectively, I agree with everything you say.

Done just over 300 miles and loved every minute of it. Having owned a mk1 Clio 1.4 RT and a new shape Vauxhall Corsa SXi I rate this above the Corsa in style, specification and performance.

Anybody considering buying a Clio upon reading this....? well what you waiting for go and get one!!!

27th May 2005, 05:10

Are parts for the Clio cheap? Seeing it is a french make. I had a peugeot and the parts were very expensive to buy, are clio's the same as I am thinking of purchasing one. Anyone help with this?

2004 Renault Clio Dymanique 1.2 16v

Summary:

A top quality purchase. Well recommended

Faults:

Absolutely nothing.

General Comments:

Purchased the car in May 2004 and I haven't wanted to stop driving it since.

Excellent performance, it really can get up to a good speed without any real effort.

It's a car full of extras with light and rain sensitive wipers/lights, cd player with great sound, sports seats and alloy wheels.

The car has a real sporty look and raises eyebrows when you drive past.

The unique radiator and front fogs make it a dream.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 15th July, 2004

2004 Renault Clio Renault Sport v6 3.0 V6

Summary:

An exclusive car with bundles of street cred

Faults:

Main Headlight blows fuse after approx. 10 minutes of engine running. Main Beam lighting relay failed at new.

General Comments:

The car performs reasonably well, not as well as the top Imprezas or Evo's, but as the reports say you'd have to be driving a Murcielago to turn more heads. The car has certain shortcomings compared to my previous cars Imprezas and an Audi TT, although makes up for these with a tremendous (engine) sound-track and all-round presence. Only seen one other on the road too so at circa £27,000 exclusivity comes at a reasonable price.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 1st July, 2004

2004 Renault Clio 182 2.0

Summary:

That'll do me nicely thank you!

Faults:

It's ironic really, all the faults listed on previous reviews of the Clio range occurred with mine.

Passenger seat rattles if no-one is sat in it, thanks to it not sitting correctly on its runners.

The rear left speaker is blown.

It hunts for its tick over speed when cold, and is lumpy at tick over.

The most astounding problem is that the leading edge of the O/S/F wing has not been painted fully! The edge nearest the headlight has primer showing. How this got past 'quality control' I have no idea!

General Comments:

All of the above does not matter really, after all, it's a cheap car.

The usual comments like 'the performance makes up for it' apply.

Took it out for a run against a mate's 4 litre Chimera and another mate's Elise, and it had no problems keeping up. Round the bends, the TVR was struggling, and the Elise driver and I called it a draw.

Unless you're up against someone who can drive like Richard Burns, there is not much out there that can give you any competition on A, B or C roads. In a flat out motorway chase, anything with more than 200 bhp (apart from an Audi TT 225 Ha! Ha!) would win, but how many times can you do that?

All in all, pleased with the car, I would not spend the extra cash for a Mini or Civic Type R. What's the point; they are slower and heavier, and there are loads on the road!

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 7th May, 2004

28th May 2004, 18:29

If the wing hasn't been painted properly at the factory you should have rejected the car there and then. Cheap car or not, this kind of thing isn't on. Neither come to mention it, are the other faults on such a new car.

Sounds like your typical French car - fantastic to drive, but built and assembled by morons using parts made out of old yogurt cartons. I've owned two Peugeots which were similar. You'll soon get sick of it.