1997 Rover - Austin 400 i 1.4
Summary:
Excellent small family car
Faults:
Clutch was worn off and had to be replaced at 70000 miles.
I had to replace the front part of the exhaust.
I know from the servicing history that the head gasket was replaced at 56000 miles.
I found once after heavy rainfall, that there is some rainwater on the bottom of the boot.
General Comments:
I think the car is underrated as its handling is very good, and the engine is a cracker.
The biggest issue is that if you are over 6 ft tall, and have to sit in the back- there is simply not enough headroom.
The 1.4 engine will suit one driving alone or with 2 persons, as it is a bit weak for a fully laden car. Wind noise is ever present, and annoying while travelling on motorways over 75 miles/h.
I like the classic shape, which aged well over time compared to its rivals - especially the french cars.
The car is reliable, but maintenance is very important, especially weekly coolant fluid checks to avoid engine overheating, which causes the well publicised head gasket failures.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 20th May, 2007
3rd Sep 2006, 17:36
This can be bettered by the car's predecessor - the Maestro - without doubt a total joke of a car with appalling build quality and reliability. You name it, it either broke, fell off or exploded! Big Ends knocking after 9,000 miles, Cylinder Head Gasket 16,000, squeaks and rattles and leaks since the day I bought the thing. After 56,000 miles I had had enough, it ate it exhaust valves and that was it, it had to go. Bought for £5000 and sold for £60! An utter disgrace of a car that also guzzled petrol like no tomorrow. Replaced by a Volvo 440 that was 500ccs bigger yet returned another 10 mpg and twice as fast and 100% reliable and lasted until 173,000 miles.