2007 SAAB 9-3 Aero 2.8 turbo

Faults:

Everything electrical branded GM fails on this car! I have had the blower motor, recirc valve, fuel door lock, cruise control, A/C temp sensor and others fail. The flipside to this is that they are all Vauxhall parts and can be bought extremely cheaply on eBay, so it's more an irritation than an expense. The drivetrain however is utterly reliable and have had no issues at all. Very solid engine.

General Comments:

Very smooth and refined, with reasonable performance. The engine can be cheaply tuned for large power gains if you wish. Fuel economy is abysmal for the performance on offer with the car averaging 23 UK MPG being driven gently. Handling is also pretty poor with the car understeering and wallowing a fair bit. You can only expect so much from 250lbft through an open differential FWD!

What this car does well is value for money. There is no other 6 cylinder turbo car that you can purchase so cheaply that I know of, and added to that the drivetrain in these cars is extremely reliable. The only problem I know of with the V6 is the coil packs, but these are cheap to replace and would not cause the car to break down.

Besides the fuel economy, running costs are quite cheap with this car (as mentioned earlier it shares parts with Vauxhall/GM).

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th December, 2019

27th Feb 2020, 23:20

I have no idea of what car you are describing, as my US Aero model is probably the best handling front drive sedan I have ever driven... and I am a car dealer and have driven everything. No wallowing in our cars, very sharp turn in and flat cornering with the sport suspension on the Aero. I would buy the 6 speed manual version, as the automatic transmission models have been known to have valve body issues. Fast, great looking sedan; worth a look.

29th Feb 2020, 16:06

On the reviewers car, it's possible the suspension could be worn, he does not mention the mileage but on a 2006/7 car it is likely to be high. I drove one of these cars when new, and although the handling was not as good as expected, it should feel tight and not wallow, so I agree with your comment.

17th Nov 2022, 16:12

In short, SAAB were OK before the GM takeover... right?

2007 SAAB 9-3 Vector Wagon 1.9 TiD 150hp turbo diesel

Summary:

No wonder they nearly went belly up!

Faults:

We knew it wasn't a good sign, when at 22,000 miles the rear brake pads wore out, and not the front. Apparently this is normal!

All four dealer supplied tyres were terrible, and had worn out before 20,000 miles.

On Christmas day, the water pump failed, and resulted in us having to refill the coolant tank every 10 minutes at the side of the road to get home. Saab Ireland refused to cover this, as it was originally English registered. After we pointed out how ridiculous this was, and after 2 months of phone calls, they said they would do this, but they would knock a year off the 3 year warranty, as it had been exported. They also said they wouldn't do the work until we had paid our local garage to prove what the problem was. €80 down the drain. We questioned their business practices of course. They had to do the timing belt as well, once they took out the water pump.

About two months later, while my mom was on the M50, it lost power steering, lights etc, and almost all power, and went into limp home mode. About every warning message came up, including brake failure. After this happening a number of times over the week, the computer finally displayed battery not charging. Obviously the alternator. We then discovered before we called Saab, that on their previous receipt for the water pump, it said the alternator needed replacing. Their reply was "your last service was three months late, so your warranty on such items is void". It had been off the road with the failed water pump at that time.

We then discovered, when we tried to put a new battery in just to drive it home, that the ECU had failed, as the car wouldn't start, and the ECU light just stayed on.

The interior was so cheap, and fell apart quickly. The plastic around the tailgate fell apart, leaving bare metal. On the exterior, the black plastic went even more blue than my 17 year old BMW, and when washed, it didn't shine as well either. Just cheap all round.

Shortly after we sold it, the new owner admitted to changing the front brake pads, two tyres again, and that the diesel injectors were leaking badly, and all had to be changed.

The car had 27,000 miles when we sold it as a non runner. I didn't think this was possible on a car less than three years old.

General Comments:

It drove great when it worked, although it spent more time off the road, as it was such an ordeal to get it fixed each time.

The suspension was good, and not too stiff and not soft either.

The steering was a little light and numb.

Brakes were very sharp.

Performance wise it was great on the motorway due to the sixth gear, but a bit slow around town because of the very evident turbo lag, which I found a bit annoying.

As for economy, it was mixed. If you were driving around town, it would get about 30-32mpg, but if you stayed below 2000rpm and kept the turbo off, you could get over 60mpg. This is far easier said than done.

On the motorway I found it was ~40mpg +-5mpg, depending on hills at 120km/h, unless you stuck at 100km/h when it would get over 50mpg easily. The economy was quite hard to judge, and obviously the turbo caused this.

The general build quality was just appalling. We've never had so many problems in such short a time period on a new (1 year old when bought) car.

The interior looked nice, but was made from such cheap materials that squeaked and rattled from day 1.

Compared to the other car we had at the time (1993 BMW 316 Touring), the interior had no rattles, the tailgate was still together, and everything but the alternator and timing belt were original in the engine (expected at that age). No comparison whatsoever.

We sold it with the failed alternator and ECU as we didn't have the money to get it fixed. We got less than a third of what we bought it for used 2 years later.

Never again.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? No

Review Date: 22nd June, 2011