2002 Seat Leon SE 1.9 turbo diesel (110bhp)

Summary:

Excellent Performance and Economy

Faults:

No faults at all with the car.

I have had no problems other than the front tyres wearing out quickly, due to heavy diesel engine and my driving style.

General Comments:

I am hard on cars generally, as I do an average of 25000 miles a year, long and short journeys, mainly over back country roads, and the Leon has behaved perfectly.

The SE model has very good handling, much better than the std golf my wife has. It behaves predictably good in corners, no under steer or over steer, and the electronic traction control gives extra stability in sharp cornering.

Trim, electronics, paint finish etc which other people have complained about, I find to be perfect.

Dealer Service was the best I have experienced yet from past experience of Ford, Peugeot and Mazda main dealers.

Car is very comfortable for long distances, superb motorway cruiser, and has plenty of gadgets.

110bhp TDi engine is brilliant - much better than that in the Peugeot. I consistently get 65mpg, and it is only Group 5 Insurance, which is 7 groups lower than the std gold 1.9 90bhp.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th October, 2003

2002 Seat Leon S 1.6

Summary:

Good, but spend the extra cash and get an Audi! Honestly

Faults:

Front near-side CV joint boot failed at 7000 miles. Replaced by dealer, but they knocked the tracking well out in the process and failed to notice. Some inconvenience getting it fixed.

Rattles intermittently (possibly linked to temperature changes) from the rear and front doors, and tailgate. Quite annoying and disappointing. Ruins the overall experience which would otherwise be blissful.

On picking the car up, the steering wheel and dash were scratched, and the dealer was not in the least bit interested in doing anything about it.

Squeaky accelerator pedal. Not really a serious concern.

General Comments:

Great value for money and a good car to own, but for the woeful dealer cooperation and frustrating rattles which betray the car's generally good build quality. This seems to be a common complaint so far as I can detect.

In summary, what's the point in spending £11,000 on something when you get this kind of service? The dealers seem to have no idea how little it takes to ruin the experience of making a large investment. At least I should be able to part-exchange it at an Audi garage later on.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 18th August, 2003

19th Aug 2003, 06:29

I don't know about Audi, but if they are anything like VW your sentiments are way off line. VW are no better than SEAT, and theres no reason to think Audi would be better.

Bottom line is that they are all the same car underneath, sharing the same components that don't work (ignition coils, ABS systems etc etc) and apparently a common approach to customer care.

You don't have to spend your hard earned with these muppets - look elsewhere.

27th Sep 2004, 14:52

Lexus deserve the results they get. To get a bad one is very rare. I deal with Lexus all the time, as I run a fleet of cars. I have had more problems with the VW than anything else! Even the Hyundai was more reliable, although interior plastics were cheap, it never went wrong. I'm afraid German build quality, except maybe BMW, is seriously over rated. Want a decent car? Buy Japanese all day long. Some may look bland or may have a boring interior, but they seldom go wrong. I have owned numerous Japanese cars and they just keep going. VW have a reputation for bad service, and it's not just the dealers, as they get poor support from head office. German or Japanese? Mmmmmmm? Hard choice that.

2002 Seat Leon Cupra R 1.8 turbo (petrol)

Summary:

Well worth the extra over a regular Cupra

Faults:

Nothing so far (although previous Cupra was far from reliable).

Tyre wear seriously worrying though - Pirelli P-Zero Rossos, worn down to the tread indicators at 7,000 miles. Hmmm, not going to be cheap to replace I guess.

Paintwork (black) terrible. Chips like crazy, and shedloads of swirling scratches. Not very impressive.

General Comments:

Performance is excellent, although not that much quicker than a well run in bog standard Cupra.

Overall though, brakes, grip and suspension more than warranty the extra £2,000 over the regular Cupra.

Like the "Spanish Skoda" quips as well - don't know if anyone's noticed, but Skodas are seriously respectable cars now - just hope that Seat can match Skoda reliability in future.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 13th June, 2003