2004 Subaru Forester XT 2.0 turbo petrol
Summary:
Quick, reliable, and versatile low-frills motoring, but expensive to run
Faults:
A buckled wheel from kerbing -- not really the car's fault though!
General Comments:
I was looking for something that combined four-wheel drive and decent ground clearance, with a bit of performance. Most off-roaders are slow and awful to drive, but the Forester is quick and handles well, and is perfect for the weekend hiking trips I take with the dog.
Permanent four-wheel-drive, with a viscous centre diff and an LSD on the rear axle, means traction in snow and muddy fields is excellent. In the snows of early 2010, the car kept going through situations I was sure it would get stuck! Coupled to a 177 bhp turbo engine, the Impreza-derived suspension and drive train delivers excellent traction on wet roads, and combined with minimum ground clearance of 20 cm, I can't think of many cars that would be faster on a wet rural back-road.
The car has delivered the excellent Japanese reliability I was expecting, and is a welcome break from the dreadful record of my previous car (a 1999 BMW 535i V8). The only expenses have been services and consumable parts.
The first downside is refinement. The cabin is quite noisy at motorway speeds, with wind noise being particularly intrusive. I have to crank the stereo right up, and conversations aren't easy. I understand 2005 and later models received more soundproofing -- the car certainly needs it.
The second downside is that it's an expensive car to run. Despite the relatively small engine, it's not much more economical than the V8 it replaced! In mixed driving, I'm averaging 26 - 28 mpg (UK). Long motorway runs return slightly worse economy, and the best I've ever managed is 31 mpg pottering around the Loire on French D roads. Service intervals are 7,500 miles/12,000 km, which leaves me paying for two services a year.
My Forester has climate control and leather seats, but you definitely get the impression that the fixtures and fittings were designed for long life, rather than surprise and delight.
On balance, I'm happy with the car. There are very few that tick so many performance, reliability, and versatility boxes so well. A little more refinement would go some way to making up for the costly running costs though!
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 2nd November, 2010
26th May 2004, 12:21
As the original writer I can now report on the Foresters progress.
Fuel consumption has slowly improved from the first tank-full.
Now averaging 28 MPG with 33 on a long run.
The car had its first service last week with no faults to report to the dealer.
The dealer has said they will honor the three years servicing deal so I'm very happy about that.
The car is a joy to drive and I look forward to driving to work and back.
The only problem on the horizon is the sunroof seemed to malfunction tonight, it refused to close properly, bouncing back to half open. I eventually managed to close it. Will ask the dealer about it tomorrow.