1992 Toyota Sera Phase III Manual SLSS 1.5 16v petrol

Summary:

Manual transmission makes it sprightly and fun, the Phase III spoiler and grey interior is handsome

Faults:

Very little has gone wrong with the car as a result of Toyota's build, though at 14, the suspension bushes, door struts and other parts are getting quite tired.

The importer made a total mess of the car's wiring, and consequently also the bodywork, just to fit a foglight. They also ruined the trim. When buying a Sera in the UK, it is worth checking the interior very carefully for damage.

The Japanese do generally take care of their cars. I wish the British would do the same.

General Comments:

The manual transmission is fantastic, with a rifle-bolt slick gearchange (click-click - very positive). Handling is poor on this one because the dampers are now well past serviceable - replacing the suspension will cost around £700 for genuine parts.

The Phase III Sera offers a couple of small refinements - it has a plastic, instead of rubber, spoiler with a high level brake light (the primary identifying factor), three-point belts in the rear on some models, and grey interiors (Phase I and II models have blue or beige). They also have side impact beams.

For servicing it is essential to take the chassis number. My car, built in July 92, required stronger door struts to compensate for the side impact protection, and I ordered the wrong kind. Doors should lift themselves from waist height, if you want to see operation is correct. Strut balancers, the internal component of the struts, actually make a significant difference on older cars. Expect to pay £300 per door to rebuild the mechanism fully.

The SLSS surround sound system is invariably broken. Aftermarket systems cannot make full use of this system, so buy with care. The processor for the sound system costs £1,253+VAT new.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd September, 2005

1991 Toyota Sera 1.5 petrol

Summary:

Looks and performance combined, a great budget beauty

Faults:

Very little trouble with this car. The door struts are slightly weak, but other than absolutely no problems.

General Comments:

This is without a doubt the best car I have ever owned for a number of reasons. While it may not be a power-house, it is certainly quick enough to handle most situations.

The reliability is incredible, a 14 year old car that will take all the abuse you can throw at it, and come out purring is a rarity. This coupled with the fantastic design, inside and out makes it a joy to own.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 10th May, 2005

14th Aug 2005, 16:03

I love these cars, the doors opening upwards make a little 'whoosh' sound in my imagination...

The door struts are probably not 'weak' per se, likely just need to be replaced or regassed (an old car remember). Just normal wear and tear, not manufactured with poor struts.

15th Jun 2006, 07:26

This is Ajay from India, I've owned this beauty for almost 2 years now. I would only say that it's a prestige to own such a car, which is in our history! Every time I look at it, I fall in love again...

Cheers

Wadhwa Ajay

22nd Dec 2006, 08:35

I have been a proud owner of this car for 8 years now. I'm in love with it. It's a beauty both from the outside and from the inside. A head turner. Very fast and economical.

I still can't believe it's a 1990 car, 16 years old, since its still one of the most sexy cars driving in todays roads.

Its not unusual to find people admiring it or watching it in amazement, as I open the doors upwards.

I just can't find the right words to describe this car... A rare Gem maybe!!!

1990 Toyota Sera ACPH 1.5 16v petrol

Summary:

Often misunderstood, Toyota's baby supercar is really a sensible, practical city car

Faults:

Very little has gone wrong with this, my second Sera. My first example had been poorly maintained - as an import, little can be known about the car's previous history, and the Sera needs to have frequent oil changes. My last one failed with 90,000 miles, the head gasket and rings went - but it had been poorly maintained. With 175,000km on this one, it's still running like clockwork.

Failures I've had to correct on this one have been the the usual failure of the headlight glass, which discolours with age, and the thermostat had stuck open - another common failure, which causes a lot of odd problems such as the gearbox refusing to engage overdrive!

Interior has held up well, though the 14 year old factory fit Double DIN stereo system is starting to flake out now. My previous Sera had worn rubbers on the doors, costing £160 per door in parts to fix properly (but no doubt good for another 14 years!).

General Comments:

The Sera is a remarkable car. Whilst people in the UK snapped up the personal imports as a miniature supercar (which, with a 110bhp engine and automatic transmission in most examples, it clearly isn't - though it does overtake with alacrity in kickdown at the critical 45-55mph speed around here), and in the Japanese market it was a sophisticated car for professional women, I actually think the Sera is the perfect town car for most people.

For the usual uses of small cars - a couple, shopping and commuting - the Sera is fantastic. The boot is small, but the rear seats fold flat, leaving a convenient and accessible platform. Most Sera owners don't make use of the boot, since the parcel shelf clips shut. The seats are ideal for petite women - the bolsters are low and narrow, so when a larger car pushes your shoulders forward, the Sera's seats fit snugly - but still tolerable for a 600km drive for a 95 percentile male - taller people will find the seats lack travel. Fuel economy is good, as you'd expect of a light, efficient Japanese car, and spares availability and cost is brilliant from Toyota main dealers - a new front bumper, pre-painted, is £215, headlights are £150 each. A full stainless exhaust system is available.

The doors - the most unique part of the car, later copied for the McLaren F1 and Ferrari Enzo - are fantastic in tight parking spaces. The sideways movement is minimal, allowing the doors to be opened fully in tight spaces, and the visibility with the glass roof is incredible. Rear seat passengers are cramped, but do enjoy excellent vision through the roof.

Handling is a touchy subject. With standard Japanese suspension (especially worn suspension, as most imports will have - Seras haven't been produced since 1994) they're skittish and twitchy, but still quite tolerable. Upgrades do improve it, but often at the expense of ride quality. Experimenting with UK-market struts from the Paseo/Starlet may result in improvements. The basic geometry of the car is fine, and the low stance means other road users assume it's faster than it is, and often let you pass without speeding up, something that happens often in my Supra.

The main criticism I have of the car is the headlights. They are abysmal, and whilst fitting new light units does improve them, the real improvement is to upgrade these early projectors (again, one of the first production cars to feature them) to HID bulbs, currently around £400 expense.

For more information on the Sera, the UK owners' 'club' has a website at http://www.toyotasera.co.uk/ where you can read more about these unusual cars, and find examples for sale.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th November, 2004

1991 Toyota Sera 1.5

Summary:

A distinctive small supercar design classic

Faults:

There are common faults on this model, eg door gas struts which eventually leak, the rubber grommet holding the bonnet prop perishes, the vinyl on the rear compartment cover can come unstuck and the headlamp covers go opaque, but can be refurbished with a light abrasive cleaner.

General Comments:

For a car which was put into production after being originally a show vehicle, it is extremely well engineered, reliable and easy to own.

Parts availability is very good.

It can seem underpowered to some, but is well within its design capabilities as a lightweight sports coupe.

Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 15th February, 2004