1984 Volkswagen Polo C 1.05
Summary:
When can I drive it again, it's not a car, it's a life :D
Faults:
When purchased:
Driver's seat worn.
Driver's seat cord to pull forward snapped.
General condition was appalling. Engine was half dismantled.
Not bad for £50(y).
General Comments:
I have driven this car once or twice, and myself put up a nice 25 miles LOL.
At the moment I've got my mum driving it, and she hates it ha, just because it doesn't have any fancy gizmo's like A/C, brake servos, all that jazz. With me, I love it.
Like in one of the other reviews, somebody said "without a brake servo, applying the brakes requires more pressure". True! It makes you more focused on your stopping distance and how you respond.
To be fair, this car doesn't drive like my last one, a Vauxhall Cavalier 2.0, but hey, I like comfort, not speed. OK, my Cavvy was nice, but considering repair costs, I would go CLASSIC every time (Y). I've had this car a year and it's taken me that long to MOT prep it (won't trust anyone else, as I'm not paying stupid prices for silly repairs I can do). Passed the MOT first time :D and it's running around again.
Would you buy another car from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 16th March, 2011
25th Dec 2006, 15:49
These vehicles have to be THE cheapest form of motoring on the road. I have driven everything from a Morris Minor to an Audi Quattro. Every car was good at something and bad at others, but the Polo did what it did brilliantly. Find a cared-for example, even if it's over 20 years old (and there's plenty of them out there) and it will still be reliable cheap no-nonsense motoring for years to come. The only thing that wears these cars out is abuse. The only thing out there comparable is a 205. You pays yer money and takes yer choice.